She sounds fine and normal.
My experience is that if a second child is non-competitive, they are behind the first as they don't get anywhere near the attention or time. However, if a second child is competitive, they are ahead of the first as they strive to keep up.
At this age, and given there's clearly nothing majorly underdeveloped, I think it's wrong to worry or give it any thought whatsoever.

Both my son and daughter could do less than that at 2.5/nearly 3.
My son was genuinely a bit behind (2 word sentences at 3) but is fine now.
My daughter was described as "very advanced" at her 2.5 development check. She could do the majority of what your kid can do but wouldn't have been able to pedal a tricycle.
It sounds like you are comparing your Dd to some exceptional and/or hothoused children.

She sounds normal and I don't think you need to worry.

Since you ask, my DD is 2.10 and sounds about the same as your DD in most things you describe. She does like puzzles though and can do her 24 piece puzzles quickly. She recognises and can name all letters and numbers but can't read. She can recite the alphabet. She loves books and appears to be able to read, because she remembers what a lot of the pages say, she can't though.

Sounds perfectly normal to me and similar to my 2.8yo (although mine can't count!)

My older ds was born 9 weeks early and did struggle with fine motor skills (drawing, jigsaws) for longer than the 2 years they say it takes to catch up, he's getting there now though at 7yo.

She sounds lovely I love that she doesn’t want to compete and would rather play with her doll house , my baby is only 9 months so no advice on your actual question but I’m sure you have no reason to worry

She sounds pretty advanced to me.
Who is comparing her unfavourably? I'd stop seeing them, how rude.

I think she sounds completely normal (as an ex early years teacher as well as a mum)

D.S. is 2.5 and people often say 'ooh he's very advanced' and is very similar in what he can do.
He's very chatty, does role play, and good at pedalling/scooter/anything physical but...
He can't reliably count to 10 (6-10 get muddled, but can touch toys and count to 5 or 6)
Only knows 2 shapes - star and circle
Will occasionally look at a book but his drawings are a 5min scribble then gets bored and wanders of.
Has never shown any interest in proper puzzles and is a menace with even paper scissors.

Parents often seem to think their own dc are advanced because they focus only on the particular thing their dc is advanced at.

I've been on mn about ten years and there are far more children who are 'top of the class' than there are classes.

My DS is 2.7 and he is very chatty, recites numbers to 20 and touch counts to about 7 reliably, very good at puzzles but doesn’t have such good fine motor skills for things like play dough, painting or drawing. He loves small world role play too, likes books but mainly for bedtime, recites his favourite books but is certainly a long way off reading! He is just starting to recognise numbers and he asks me what the letters are and can point out if there are two Es but doesn’t recognise them otherwise.
He can’t pedal yet and finds his balance bike very difficult (“too wobbly mummy”) but is a whizz on a scooter.

Your DD sounds perfectly normal.

My Kids were ahead of DD in terms of counting and jigsaws and were dry at night but by the sounds of it were definitely behind yours in terms of social skills (which at that age are actually much more important). I think people tend to focus on the more "academic" skills when toddlers should be focused on emotional and social skills. It sounds like your DD is doing really well. You should be proud!

My daughter is 2.10 and pretty much exactly the same. She is a second child.
She does have a couple of exceptional skills.. she can open the baking cupboard and find the raisins and pour them all over the floor several times a day. this is the only time it is acceptable to not be touching me.

Another vote that she sounds completely normal! My DD1 loved drawing and colouring from an early age - however DD2 had no interest and preferred imaginative play like your DD. At age 3, even with encouragement, she would only put pen to paper for about 2 mins at a time. Now, aged 4 and just started school, she has just got into enjoying drawing (and early writing).

Your daughter sounds like she's way ahead of my daughter. My daughter is 2 and 9 months, she was very slow at learning to talk and has only really just started to speak in simple sentences. She wasn't prem and she doesn't have anything (that we know of) wrong with her, she's just a little bit slow.

I got a little bit obsessed with comparing her to my friend's little boy who is a week younger than her, he's done everything before she has, bar potty training. I realised quite a while ago when he started to talk quite clearly and my daughter was literally saying 3 words max that it wasn't healthy to be so obsessed with the speed they were developing and reaching milestones. My daughter is doing just fine, a little bit slower than others but I'm sure she'll catch up.

I was the same as a child, I was very slow at learning to talk and read but I achieved high grades and have 3 degrees. I'm dyslexic, so the chances are my daughter is too. I've decided I'm not going to stress myself out comparing her to other kids. I don't think anyone should compare, every child is different and will learn at their own pace.

I'm not going to compare but I've still writes this post oops!

Sounds totally normal. It doesn’t really matter if she’s interested in letters/numbers at this age. It’s unlikely to make much difference in the long term.