@Birdsgottafly
You are correct that I, along with many others, do struggle with comprehending something that looks absolutely nothing like any recognised form of English (or any other language, for that matter). The whole idea of language is so that people are able to communicate by using standard recognised words, grammar and punctuation. Even pidgin forms of language are those which have developed within communities where many people understand them, but there is no sense at all in inventing your own individual form of language that nobody else does, if you hope to communicate successfully and be widely understood.
I don't do it myself - I DO simply move on - but when people respond to an incomprehensible OP by saying or indicating that they can't understand it, how do you know that they're just trying to be superior and to slap the OP down? If everybody simply ignored it, the OP may be desperately hoping for viewpoints or advice on a serious, personally-important issue and wondering why nobody cares, without realising that people WOULD happily engage and try to help if only they could understand what the question or situation was?
Where did I ever say that I wanted to ridicule or belittle people who have poor grammar? OK, I jokingly said about wanting to slap people who insert 'like' as every other word in a sentence, but I was obviously not being serious there and such is clearly a case of bad habit rather than a misunderstanding of correct grammar. I would never ridicule somebody for it - I just wouldn't be able to communicate with them if their grammar is so poor that it's incoherent to a standard speaker of English. I would also say that many of the incoherent posts are not largely a result of poor grammar, but rather a laziness in not bothering to check what you have typed before posting something that you expect others to understand.
I do agree that there have been many appalling government cuts, which have had very far-reaching negative consequences, and I don't personally work in education; but I still fail to see how spending lots more money on it would magically enable teachers to teach good grammar rather than incorrect grammar (if that is what certain teachers are indeed doing).
If you're suggesting that poorer people from less privileged backgrounds can't be expected to attend school as children (or listen and learn when there) or, as adults, to access whichever readily-available resources that they might want/need (even something as basic as a dictionary) - when everybody who is posting online clearly has internet access - then that is rather offensive to the many who DO take some personal pride and take the trouble to do so.
If you think that I have nothing better to do than to roll around on the floor chuckling whenever I see somebody using incorrect grammar online, you are sadly mistaken. I do not 'have issues' in choosing to participate in a voluntary discussion thread lamenting the widespread lowering of the standards in the main language of my country (which I agree is 'made up', although I'd probably describe it as 'developed' over hundreds of years of mass communication) and the resulting comprehension difficulties.
Would you retire to Spain without a word of Spanish and just expect to shout at people in English or make frantic hand gestures to them without any embarrassment for the rest of your life, on the assumed basis that 'they know what I mean'?
Language is a vital part of our human co-existence and, whilst I have no interest in ridiculing people for every error that they make (and I make errors myself sometimes, too - I'm not Susie Dent), I don't thinnk it's fair to accuse people of 'having issues' when they express sadness about the increasing loss of such an important skill and part of what it is to be human.