Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to expect better?

12 replies

BreakdownWoes · 30/08/2018 13:31

Yesterday our car broke down on our way home from a trip to the seaside.

We were on a major 'A' road when an alarm in the car started pinging and the heating gauge shot up to the max. Fortunately we were right next to a slip road so quickly pulled off and parked up in a kinda industrial/retail car park next to another dual carriageway. It was 9pm and we were 45 minutes away from home.

We called our breakdown company and also told them that we had autistic children and an assistance dog in the vehicle. They told us we would be a priority. 10 minutes later the breakdown man arrived. I was very impressed with how quickly he arrived. He determined the water pump seal had gone and the car was not drivable. Told us we would need to be recovered but as there was 5 of us plus the dog we would need to wait for a larger vehicle. He said wait was currently 1.5 hours but as we were priority it would probably be less and we would be kept updated.

1.5 hours went by, nothing. Was quite challenging keeping the children calm (one was convinced the car was about to explode and kept trying to run away). The truck finally arrived over 2 hours later, it was now 11:30pm. We started to get the dog out of the car (she was snuggled up with 5 year old sleeping), when the breakdown man announced 'the dog can't travel in the van'. We had made it quite clear from the start we had a dog, at no point did anyone tell us it would be an issue. We are used to being able to take her anywhere (she is training to become an assistance dog).

He suggested we leave the dog in the vehicle whilst it was being towed. I asked if I could stay with dog and was told no. Leaving the poor dog alone in a vehicle being towed was absolutely not an option so we had no choice but to leave me and the dog behind.

We were also told he could only make a single trip so we could choose to be taken home (and then have no way of taking car to a garage the next day) or be dropped off outside garage at 12:30am with 3 young children (two autistic) and no way to get home. I was under the impression I had onward travel included. In the end the recovery guy took pity on us and agreed to drop my husband and the children off at home as it was only a short distance out of his way.

I managed to find a friend who was able to drive out to me and take me home. Fortunately there was a McDonald's nearby, and although it was technically closed as only the drive-thru is 24hr the manager let me and the dog sit inside the restaurant while I waited (they even offered us both food and drink). I eventually arrived home sometime after 1am.

After an initial complaint, the breakdown company have told us it's down to each recovery drivers discretion as to whether or not they allow dogs. If they had made this clear to us at 9pm and discussed with us fully our options for getting home we could have made alternative arrangements much sooner.

I've subsequently looked at the terms and conditions and whilst they are technically correct, I think it's really poor customer service. I do indeed have onward travel but the onus is on the customer to request it. However, none of the options (hire car, public transport, or hotel) would have actually been available to us in that location at that time of day. Breaking down is stressful, it's especially stressful with young children with SN and a dog. I wasn't thinking clearly, is it too much to expect the breakdown company to fully communicate the options available to me? To explain that they don't actually intend to take us home? To point out they may not accept the dog? What would've happened if we had still been on the motorway?

OP posts:
Clairetree1 · 30/08/2018 13:35

Breaking down is stressful. Getting home after being stranded at night is stressful. I think the breakdown company did fulfil their duties, though, they checked the car, couldn't fix it, towed it to where you wanted it, offered to keep the dog in the car being towed.

you could have maybe got a taxi?

BoobleMcB · 30/08/2018 13:45

Sorry for your experience, as PP said breaking down is never fun at the best of times. I always thought that onward travel only included to one place though? I.e. to wherever you were travelling OR to a garage. Never to both?

Alpacanorange · 30/08/2018 14:16

It wasn’t technically a working assistance dog and therefore had you on a technicality.

Alpacanorange · 30/08/2018 14:20

And yes onward travel is one destination.

BreakdownWoes · 30/08/2018 14:21

Recovery includes to one place. Onward travel should get you home. Else why pay the extra?

My complaint is more the lack of communication. As we have onward travel we could've possibly got a taxi (assuming a taxi falls within the definition of 'public transport') but this was never communicated to us as an option.

We should've been told the dog may pose a problem straight away. It is ridiculous to suggest a dog be left alone in a vehicle being towed. She would have been traumatised. If it's safe enough for the dog to stay in the vehicle, I should have been allowed to stay with her.

The recovery driver said we should've been offered a taxi two hours earlier.

OP posts:
MrsRubyMonday · 30/08/2018 14:24

We were picked up by a tow truck with a large dog in the car. We waited five hours in the rain for the truck to get to us, and they wouldn't let the dog in the van. The lady explained this was due to previous people suing due to allergies after cross contamination. We left the dog in the car on the flat bed, we had no other choice at the time. Dog was fine though, they aren't in any more danger than if they ride in your car normally anyway, the car is secured. The company got to you quickly, and were prepared to take you home. You didn't like the option they gave you, so it's up to you to arrange something else. They even went out of their way to help you get home and the car to the garage, we ended up having to be picked up from the garage by family.

BreakdownWoes · 30/08/2018 14:26

Yes, as she is still in the training stages legally they don't have to accommodate her. However, I have a feeling the response would've been the same regardless.

OP posts:
BreakdownWoes · 30/08/2018 14:31

My point is I should have be told two hours previous that the dog might have to stay alone in the vehicle rather than the van.

I absolutely couldn't leave her, we have to abide by strict rules training her to become an assistance dog. It's not the same as a pet dog. If the dog is fine and safe to be in the car on the flat bed so am I.

OP posts:
Aaaahfuck · 30/08/2018 14:33

After being let down by a cheaper company (breakdown assist) I am with RAC. They aren't as good as I thought they would be unfortunately. I don't understand why when they knew yiu had a dog with you from the start of the incident why they didn't mention the dog not being able to travel at the start. Also if the dog is in training to be an assistance dog they're on dodgy ground.

My understanding of onward travel is they take the car to a garage and you either home or to a safe space depending on your level of cover. You pay extra for onward travel so I would assume this was an additional journey or place otherwise why pay more.

Clairetree1 · 30/08/2018 14:34

They don't know your dog. They can't risk locking you in with a dog. If it attacked you they would be liable

serbska · 30/08/2018 14:45

I absolutely couldn't leave her, we have to abide by strict rules training her to become an assistance dog. It's not the same as a pet dog. If the dog is fine and safe to be in the car on the flat bed so am I.

There are different laws for dogs and humans.

Dogs can travel in cars without a seat belt. Humans can not.

The whole thing sounds stressful and not very ideal. And I am with you - recovery is being towed to a location of your choice (garage) and the onward travel is the bit that should have got you home (but presumably a local taxi firm would have done that and you reclaim?).

mrsjoyfulprizeforraffiawork · 30/08/2018 15:18

Dogs can travel in cars without a seat belt. Humans can not

The law states that dogs must be "suitably restrained" in cars so they cannot distract driver or injure anyone during an emergency stop. That means, apparently, by seatbelt (you can buy dog ones to attach to human seatbelts), pet carrier, etc or separate caged off area at back. They are not allowed to be "free", by law, in a car.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.