Re trans - I agree that women’s rights to safe spaces need to be protected, and that the changes in the law might make vulnerable women more vulnerable.
Having said that, people transitioning or who want to, undoubtedly need support and help. It seems that the law changes are blunt instruments and are not looking at the bigger picture - ie. the rights of vulnerable women who might be targeted by people abusing the new situation (hopefully a minority of people).
This is my take on the situation anyway.
Having said that - THIS - just takes the biscuit - on many levels
.
www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/01/freemasons-to-admit-women-but-only-if-they-first-joined-as-men
Slightly different to the current issue in that these would be women who had completely transitioned (I suppose), but that really says it all - you can join - as long as you started off as a man.
Or am I missing something?
Why do the Freemasons exclude women anyway (apart from their two women only lodges)?