Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to be outraged by US govt bullying to defend the interests of formula manufacturers when trying to block a UN World Health Association breastfeeding resolution

5 replies

BigChocFrenzy · 09/07/2018 15:04

www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/us-opposition-to-breastfeeding-motion-stuns-world-health-officials-1.3558786

A resolution to encourage breastfeeding was expected to be approved quickly and easily
by the hundreds of government delegates who gathered this spring in Geneva for the United Nations-affiliated World Health Assembly.

Based on decades of research, the resolution says that mother’s milk is healthiest for children
and countries should strive to limit the inaccurate or misleading marketing of breast milk substitutes.

Then the US delegation, embracing the interests of infant formula manufacturers, upended the deliberations.

American officials sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to “protect, promote and support breastfeeding”

and another passage that called on policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that many experts say can have deleterious effects on young children.

When that failed, they turned to threats,
according to diplomats and government officials who took part in the discussions.

Ecuador, which had planned to introduce the measure, was the first to find itself in the cross hairs.

The Americans were blunt:
If Ecuador refused to drop the resolution, Washington would unleash punishing trade measures and withdraw crucial military aid.

The Ecuadorean government quickly acquiesced.

Health advocates scrambled to find another sponsor for the resolution,
but at least a dozen countries, most of them poor nations in Africa and Latin America, backed off, citing fears of retaliation,
according to officials from Uruguay, Mexico and the United States.

Patti Rundall, policy director of the British advocacy group Baby Milk Action:
“What happened was tantamount to blackmail, with the US holding the world hostage
and trying to overturn nearly 40 years of consensus on the best way to protect infant and young child health,”

It was the Russians who ultimately stepped in to introduce the measure
– and the Americans did not threaten them.

The confrontation was the latest example of the Trump administration siding with corporate interests on numerous public health and environmental issues.

< Trump's US govt only bullies weak countries.
They manage to make Putin's govt look like the good guys Hmm >

OP posts:
woman11017 · 10/07/2018 08:26

What happened was tantamount to blackmail, with the US holding the world hostage

Breast feeding: free and healthy (and painful and not always possible, I know) In poor countries without anti biotics, breast feeding is a woman's life saver: preventing the fatal dangers of mastitis and pregnancy and childbirth.

Trump hates women and children.

Peregrina · 10/07/2018 08:31

Also preventing diseases in the baby caused by formula mixed with dirty ish water and diluted too heavily.

BigChocFrenzy · 10/07/2018 13:44

It is just one example of Trump's ruthless trade policy:
profits before poor people & babies - and bully their governments to allow this

OP posts:
BigChocFrenzy · 10/07/2018 13:53

The gloves come off, outside rich Western countries.
Formula companies selling there feel free to do anything, say anything in their ads, anything for profit

Mumsnet often debates how much difference BF makes in rich countries like the UK.
However, we all agree that in poor countries, BF is genuinely essential whenever possible,
because of frequently contaminated water
or poor women diluting formula too much.

Some women there are conned into thinking that formula is better than their own (free) milk

The problem is: companies don't make profits from BF

OP posts:
Peregrina · 10/07/2018 17:51

Some women there are conned into thinking that formula is better than their own (free) milk

But in that they are only following the trend which was set in rich countries in the 1930s and 40s. My own late DM was let to believe that her own milk was 'poor stuff', her words, in 1949/50 with my DB, and that baby powder (not called formula then) was easier, because there was Science behind it, and it was easier to measure how much the baby was getting. Besides which breast feeding was a bit 'lower class' but we didn't say that sort of thing.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread