I was reading a thread earlier where people seemed to be dismissing a very substantial picnic as a snack, and that people would need something hot later, which I thought was a bit odd. And then tonight, we weren’t having a sit down dinner because of the foot ball, so I made myself an amazing sandwich with good bread, lots of salad and some left over steak with left over roasted vegetables on the side. I offered to make the same for teenage ds, but he said he’d make himself a “proper meal” later. What he did was make some mashed potato, and heat up the steak and the vegetables and eat it with a side salad. He insists that his meal was much more substantial than mine, and mine was more of a snack. Despite the fact that the quantities and ingredients were the same, and the only difference was that his was hot, and he had mash instead of bread. I think he’s bonkers. You all agree with me, surely?