You aren’t unreasonable. But I think the level of benefit outweighs the harm....just.
What would be nice is if it outweighed the harm a lot. How? By reducing the harm. How do we do that? Increase accountability.
You need a licence to drive a car because of the harm it could cause to others. Why not licence use of the internet, issue something like an NI number to all people over l, I dunno, 12?, that makes most people’s internet activity traceable if necessary.
I get that people won’t be happy about the privacy issue, but there’s got to be a way around that. We wouldn’t need to track activity like people going on and reading the news, ordering something from a Amazon, but anything whereby you can create “content” no matter how small be that a blog post, Facebook post, reply on twitter / instagram could be traced to an individual if, say, the police applied to court to court to trace them. Same as it is now with a search warrant, the police can’t just rock up and look around my house without a reason to.
I’m sure there would be ways around it. Driving licences don’t stop people doing dumb things in cars or criminals without licences, but it does at least create some kind of barrier.
I’m sure that 95% of the people that cause harm out there do it because of anonymity. Take that away or at least create a barrier to that and things would improve. Some of these idiots really would stop and think “maybe it’s not worth getting a fake net licence just to tell Amanda Holden I hate her”
Maybe I’m naive and these things can always be beaten. I just think it would be a start. If the internet just arrived one day, rather than gradually evolve like it has, a lot of this licencing etc would have been considered in advance. Sadly the nature of politics means that 90% of the lawmakers are from a past generation and don’t even understand the ins and out of the internet, how can the legislate it.