I want to know who you think is being unreasonable in this situation.
You have a £300,000 mortgage.
You have a property that has scope for improvement and you would be able to get a small income from it if you could afford to make the said improvements.
The property is in fairly good condition but has a few things, like most places, that’s could be done that would add value if you were to ever sell.
Person A wants to pay off as much of the mortgage as possible and then pay it off sooner/have a smaller monthly payment so could save money and improve the house eventually (would take a few years to save enough)
Person B wants to invest all the money into the property which would add value and bring in roughly £17,000 a year (could be more, might be less) the work would add about £200,000 or so to the selling cost of the property (obviously this depends on house prices not crashing)
Who is BU and which would you do, or would you do something completely different?