Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be so lost after PSHE comment on consent/alcohol and now situation with DD. *trigger warning, mentions rape*

188 replies

Itssohothere · 22/05/2018 10:18

I have tried my best to word this post best as I can, but if anyone is offended then I do apologise. I did consider the feminism section but this is also about general parenting advice as well so hopefully here is okay.

DD is 16 and currently doing GCSE’s. Study leave has been removed for the whole year due to lack of said studying. The school have decided to continue with PSHE, God knows why, so DD is still attending hourly PSHE sessions once a week.

The PSHE teacher has reportedly said, “if a man and woman have sex and either is drunk, it’s rape.” Bear in mind this is my 16 year old DD’s account.

DD has come home very angry with this statement and has asked me to explain this. According to my DD, she has had sex when drunk before at a party and doesn’t consider herself to have been raped. I knew DD was sexually active but this conversation has thrown me and I don’t think I’ve done DD justice in explaining the teachers comment.

I tried to explain that a woman cannot consent if drunk, which is as far as I got really. But DD then went back to the point if she didn’t think she has been raped, surely not every woman who has drunken sex has been raped and if the man is drunk he cannot consent also. Which again, please bear in mind is my DD’s opinion, not my own. And she is 16, very strong headed and opinonated. I know many people will disagree with her here.

So AIBU on several points here:

A) to be concerned that my DD has had drunken sex at a party? I knew she had had sex with her ex boyfriend, and she was fully advised and prepared in terms of protection, but I wasn’t aware of drunken sex at parties. She shouldn’t be drinking, so I can punish her for drinking... but at the same time I feel like I’d be punishing for having sex which I don’t want too do, as obviously this wouldn’t be healthy at all. What do I do here? Let it go and accept she’s just at this stage now? We are close, she’s always told me stuff so I’m grateful that our closeness has led to conversations about protection, etc... and has allowed me to help her get herself on the pill, talk her through the confusion of when she first had sex and felt upset after, etc... and I don’t want to ruin this. I like the fact she trusts me so much and is willing to confide in me and I don’t want to lose this.

And B) she’s leaving school soon, but AIBU to be annoyed at how sloppy this PSHE lesson was? And want there to be some sort of follow up? Clearly some girls have been left confused and angsted.

And finally, what the hell do I say to my DD? A woman can’t consent if she’s drunk, but if you have sex whilst drunk and are perfectly happy with the activities, then of course you don’t have to think of yourself as raped- but have to bear in mind that a woman still cannot consent if drunk, you cannot speak for other women, therefore another woman in the same situation may very well consider themselves to have been raped and in which case this will have been rape?

But then by saying this I feel like I am telling my DD that a woman chooses if she has been raped, which of course isn’t true.

So can someone more articulate please provide me with an explanation, resource or input I can share with my daughter here? I feel like this a chance I have to make a positive impact on her development and I don’t want to eff up here but explaining something terribly.

Thank you.

OP posts:
cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:32

It might not be "right" but it isn't rape

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:33

Its so important that we get this right otherwise it undermines us as a group.

sirlee66 · 22/05/2018 12:34

Get DD to watch this 2 mins video from Thames Valley Police.

Absolutely brilliant video and makes understanding concent very clear.

I wish they would show this video in schools.

Spaghettijumper · 22/05/2018 12:34

You'll be surprised to learn cloudtree that getting money off people in the street by harassing them is actually totally illegal and the fact that you don't know that really boggles me!

MirriVan · 22/05/2018 12:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

rosesandflowers · 22/05/2018 12:36

Perhaps the analogy of signing a contract will help your DD. If you're too intoxicated to fully comprehend what you're signing, then you can't fully agree to the terms of the contract, even if you appear to sign it.

As for being concerned about your DD - I wouldn't say "self respect" is a problem (how 1950's!) but if you're worried about your DD being out of her depth/in danger obviously probe it.

I would suggest maybe probing the rape issue in a more personal context too. Obviously I don't know, but is it possible such a violent reaction is due to your DD coming to the realisation that one of her encounters was perhaps not necessarily fully consensual?

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:38

spag in certain situations (not all) for a completely different reasons. Public disorder reasons - not consent related at all

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:39

To explain further, nagging a woman for sex might amount to harassment (also an offence in the right circumstances). It would still not be rape if she ultimately agreed.

Spaghettijumper · 22/05/2018 12:40

If a man is begging and nagging a woman to have sex and she doesn't want it, and has the option to say no, then she'll say no.

If she doesn't want it, but says yes anyway because of the begging and nagging then he has coerced her into sex and that is rape.

It's actually not that complicated. If a person doesn't want something and they can say no, they will say no.
If a person doesn't want something and feels for whatever reason they can't say no, then they've been coerced. Coercing someone into sex is rape.

MirriVan · 22/05/2018 12:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Spaghettijumper · 22/05/2018 12:41

Equally with the money example - if I don't want to give you money, then I won't give it to you.

If I feel I have no choice but to give it to you, then you've stolen it. Simple.

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:42

If a man is begging and nagging a woman to have sex and she doesn't want it, and has the option to say no, then she'll say no.

If she doesn't want it, but says yes anyway because of the begging and nagging then he has coerced her into sex and that is rape.

Nope

Pengggwn · 22/05/2018 12:42

Spaghettijumper

I didn't actually say that. I said it isn't stealing. And it isn't.

Spaghettijumper · 22/05/2018 12:44

How do you figure it isn't stealing Pengggwn. Surely if I don't want to give someone my money but I end up giving it to them because of their behaviour, they've stolen from me?

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:45

To clarify I was also referring to the statement that it's stealing (wasn't thinking about begging disorder offences)

specialsubject · 22/05/2018 12:45

pity everyone pussyfoots about the issue that it isnt a great idea to get steaming drunk. might reduce your odds of rape or accident if you swill less. doesnt excuse rape, before the hard of thinking jump on this - there are plenty of sickos who prefer their women unconscious.

our local town has a river and lots of bars,and hence regular dead drunks. there is a lot of talk of barriers and patrols, but no suggestion that drinking less might save a lot of pain.

Pengggwn · 22/05/2018 12:45

If a person doesn't want something and feels for whatever reason they can't say no, then they've been coerced. Coercing someone into sex is rape.

Again, I just don't think you know what you're talking about. Coercion has a legal threshold that must be reached.

Another example would be, if someone came up to me in the street and nagged and begged me to commit a bank robbery for them. I do it. My defence is that I have been coerced. That would never stack up in court, because my free will would not be considered to have been violated, in the same way as it would have been if the other person had coerced me at gunpoint. As the law would have it, I could just have said no.

Spaghettijumper · 22/05/2018 12:46

What do you mean nope Cloud - are you saying that a man can get sex from an unwilling woman as long as he uses nagging and begging to do it?

Pengggwn · 22/05/2018 12:46

Spaghettijumper

With respect, I really can't be bothered arguing with someone who can't be bothered doing the most basic research into definitions of words! Over and out.

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:46

If you give someone money they haven't stolen from you

They might possibly have misled you, might have defrauded you etc depending on the circumstances. Might have harassed you. They haven't stolen it though, you gave it to them.

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:49

Spag I am saying that if a man nags a woman for sex and she say yes then she has absolutely not been raped.

If a man nags a woman for sex and she says no and he has sex with her anyway then she has been raped.

This is really clouding the whole issue of drunkenness which is an interesting consent issue since people could be capable of saying the word yes but clearly still too drunk to understand what is going on.

cloudtree · 22/05/2018 12:51

Clearly I am not referring to the literal knife to neck/kidnapped and tied up/threatening to cause harm to a loved one situation. That is a world apart from the normal meaning of a man nagging a woman for sex.

Spaghettijumper · 22/05/2018 12:52

Right so you do believe a man can get sex from an unwilling woman as long as he uses nagging to get it.

A 'yes' that comes through coercion is not consent.

I think many women reject the idea of it because so many women end up having sex that they don't want with partners who put pressure on them. No woman should put up with that.

My daughter will learn that she should never ever ever ever have sex unless she absolutely wants it, herself, without any pressure from anyone.

Pengggwn · 22/05/2018 12:53

That is a world apart from the normal meaning of a man nagging a woman for sex

Not just a difference of degree - one could never be mistaken for the other by anyone with an understanding of English.

Spaghettijumper · 22/05/2018 12:54

Why are you keen to defend men who have sex with women who don't want sex?