I never did pluck up the courage to ask the lady to switch off her engine, but she seems to have stopped dropping off her children altogether
What I did do, however, was to research the subject and draft up this feedback for the Department of the Environment, who are currently consulting on their Clean Air Strategy and have asked for feedback. As it contained nothing on engine idling, I wrote this:
-----------
Rt. Hon Michael Gove MP,
Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
[email protected]
Dear Mr Gove
Thank you for publishing the Clean Air Strategy consultation paper, on which I would like to provide some feedback
I would like to see the government Clean Air Strategy having an element addressing the pollution produced by stationary vehicles idling their engines
Whilst engine idling is not the key strategic issue for clean air, it is a problem that generates concentrated pollution in populated areas, and could be addressed easily by nudging driver behaviour – a potential quick win
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ENGINE IDLING
The US Environment Protection Agency states:
"Idling vehicles contribute to air pollution and emit air toxins, which are pollutants known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health effects. Monitoring at schools has shown elevated levels of benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and other air toxics during the afternoon hour coinciding with parents picking up their children. Children’s lungs are still developing, and when they are exposed to elevated levels of these pollutants, children have an increased risk of developing asthma, respiratory problems and other adverse health effects. Limiting a vehicle’s idling time can dramatically reduce these pollutants and children’s exposure to them." www.epa.gov/region8/idle-free-schools
Engine idling tends to occur in busy populated areas and disproportionately impacts children – children will inhale more pollutants from engines as they tend to be smaller and nearer tailpipes, and their growing hearts and lungs are more susceptible to the effects of particulates and other pollutants.
Idling also often occurs around schools. As I’m sure you are aware that a reported 25% of London children to attend a school where NOx and particulate levels exceed legal limits, and reducing idling is one clear, concrete step that could help reduce this problem in the short term, just through simple behaviour changes
Research shows that an idling car engine will, on average, produce 150 balloons of exhaust emissions containing harmful chemicals like NOx, PM2.5 and Cyanide every single minute.
Not only does this significantly reduce the air quality of passers-by, tests show that levels of carbon monoxide and other pollutants inside the idling vehicle itself can often be even more harmful levels. In extreme cases, such as exhaust pipes obstructed by snow or walls, idling has led to the deaths of vehicle occupants. If somebody sits regularly sits inside an idling car, perhaps due to the nature of their employment, this could impact their long term health
KEY POPULATIONS WHO IDLE
Just through personal observation, I have noticed that engine idling is particularly pronounced in these populations
· Cars on the school run – this is particularly pronounced in hot weather, when parents waiting for children keep engines running for air conditioning, causing an invisible cloud of pollution that children walk through at just the wrong height
· Taxis – I have particularly noticed grossly excessive idling on taxi ranks in busy areas such as railway stations and town centre ranks, or just simply waiting for any fare. Aside from the impact on passers-by, this is a health & safety issue for the taxi drivers themselves, where they suffer regular prolonged exposure to pollutants from diesel engines through either idling themselves or being ranked next to idlers.
· Delivery drivers – who may not turn off their van or lorry engine in an entire shift, even though each drop may take quite some time. These tend to be larger diesel engines with higher emissions, and because the average UK diesel LGV is over 7 years old, they tend be pre-date EURO6 ‘cleaner’ diesel engines
· Waiting Shoppers – again, this is particularly pronounced in hot or colder weather, and tends to be in areas of high footfall
· Buses/ coaches – I have observed many buses leaving their engines on at stands, even when their next trip is 30 minutes away. Some may not turn off their engines all day. Given their size and older age engine profile, idling from buses and coaches tends to be disproportionate to their number
Incidentally, around 9 out of every 10 idling drivers I have observed happen to be male; the key exception being around schools. This may or may not be representative.
POTENTIAL ACTIONS
Steps that could be considered in an anti-idling strategy include:
· Provision of anti-idling signs, for use near schools, car parks, taxi ranks and level crossings
· A school letter home from schools from the Secretary of State, distributed at each school, asking parents to refrain from idling (via parentmail for example)
· Provide a resource kit for an individual school campaign
· Ask pupils to undertake a school project on how to reduce idling at their school
· Work with organisations such as bus companies, Taxi Driver associations and larger taxi firms (perhaps stressing the employee health & safety aspects), Road Hauliers Association, Network Rail and websites such as Mumsnet
· Provision of volunteer ‘air marshalls’ to ask idlers to refrain from idling
· Directives from the relevant Secretaries of State prohibiting their employees from extended idling on school buses, ambulances, police cars or military vehicles (where not required for operational reasons) or the UK Civil Service car fleet and implementing an anti-idling policy (See No Idling Policy | ChangeLab Solutions )
· A modest advertising campaign to dispel the many myths that motivates idling rather than switching off. These may stress the damage done to the driver and passengers, as well as passers-by
· Provision of online educational resources, infographics, posters for schools, myth-busting research and other literature (See US EPA resources here www.epa.gov/region8/idle-free-schools )
· More emphasis in the highway code and driving theory test, and PSV and HGV tests
· Inclusion of an anti-idling module in Health & Safety Executive safety advice, particularly for lorry, coach and bus drivers
· Encouraging or incentivising anti-idling technology such as installing auxiliary power units or automatic shutdown devices
· I am loathe to suggest penalties as I believe that most people who idle don’t understand the impact but will change behaviour when they learn about it. However, there might be symbolic value in raising the potential fine to £1,000 for refusing to cease idling, just for the headline figure and PR value
EXPECTED BENEFICIAL OUTCOMES
· Reduced vehicle idling
· Reduced emissions (NOx, Particulates, CO2, Carbon Monoxide, benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and other air toxics)
· Reduced fuel wastage and improved vehicle life
· Improved air quality, particularly in populated areas and around schools
· Improved health outcomes
· Meet legal obligations
Thank you for your attention. I am sure that you’ll agree that an anti-idling strategy could be a key part of the government’s overall Clean Air Strategy 2018 and one which could deliver important results in both the short and long term