An NHS clinician does not have any right to refuse medical advice or treatment to a patient merely because that patient wants to take\is taking, whether overtly or covertly, an audio-recording of their own personal consultation behind closed doors (as a personal activity). There is no ‘right to decline’ the service to which the patient is statutorily entitled in these circumstances, and still less is the patient under any obligation whatsoever to justify or explain to anyone their decision so to record.
The NHS finally acknowledged this in May 2016, in a document you access here:-
www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/379944/response/916674/attach/html/3/Patients%20recording%20NHS%20staff%20in%20health%20and%20social%20care%20settings%20guidance%20May%202016.pdf.html
There is no ’equivalent’ or ‘reciprocal’ entitlement for a clinician to record a patient without the patient’s permission. That would be part of a professional not a personal activity (and likely to contravene Data Protection legislation as a consequence); and, other than in exceptional circumstances, it would also be prohibited by the rules of professional conduct maintained by the General Medical Council.
In commenting as above, I have used some language from legislation which comes into force tomorrow, but which, as regards this specific topic, makes no difference to the legal regime which applies today, as indeed it has for many years.
Having studied this subject most of this millennium, I have come to the not-very-difficult conclusion that the predominant reason why patients often record covertly is because they fear that the clinician(s) involved may remain ignorant of the law and practice which applies, and, coupling that ignorance with arrogance, might act may act in a petulant, obstructive, even hostile, fashion, if the patient says their want to audio-record their consultation – potentially to the great detriment of their healthcare.
I have also come to the not-very-difficult conclusion that in far too many cases patients would be right so to fear.
This is not an impasse. Clued-up patients will simply go on recording covertly, and the latest evidence suggests that maybe 15% to 20% in the UK already do just that. If clinicians would prefer that any recording was done overtly, they need simply to put a notice up in their waiting-rooms saying that patients are welcome to audio-record their own, personal, consultations openly. Easy. Furthermore, patients’ covert recordings can be produced in legal and disciplinary proceedings, and indeed have been, with serious consequences for the doctors concerned. You would think by now physicians would have worked out the best course of action here…, but I am aware of exactly one such notice in the UK (actually its in a GP Practice’s website blurb, but it’s the same point).
Good health to all contributors and viewers, and thanks to OP for starting (and, if I may say so, sanely ‘stewarding’) this thread.