Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Company van prang - who should pay?

11 replies

Slarti · 03/05/2018 16:03

DW has had a minor prang in the van she drives for work. Damage to third party, none to company van. She has offered to pay for the damage directly to the third party and informed her boss that this is what she will do, which he has accepted.

My view is that this should go through the company insurance and I feel that her boss is being a bit of a CF in allowing her to pay out of her own money. Having said that as the driver at fault she is culpable so maybe I am BU. But what's the point of a company having insurance on their company vehicles if any accidents come out of staff wages?

The damage is about a week of her wages, if that makes any difference.

OP posts:
UpstartCrow · 03/05/2018 16:04

I'd expect the insurance to cover it. If she were for example drunk, then I'd expect her to lose the right to drive for the company.

Slarti · 03/05/2018 16:09

She wasn't drunk Confused

She was performing her usual duties at work and has clipped another vehicle on a car park.

OP posts:
helloflamingogo · 03/05/2018 16:10

It should go through the company’s insurance although there may be a rule that she pays part of the excess if it’s her fault.

If she’s offered, the manager isn’t being a CF - if she doesn’t want to do it then don’t offer Confused

Graphista · 03/05/2018 16:12

Why on earth did she offer to pay??

Manager is not daft accepting that but wife shouldn't have offered! Let ins deal with it.

Slarti · 03/05/2018 16:14

If she’s offered, the manager isn’t being a CF - if she doesn’t want to do it then don’t offer

Perhaps CF isn't the right phrase. It's in her nature to have offered to pay, but to me the right thing would be to decline her offer and put it through the company insurance since she was working for the company at the time of the accident. Instead, he will allow her to go without a week's wages?

OP posts:
Brendatheblender · 03/05/2018 16:14

I used to deal with our van drivers accidents in at my old job.

Drivers always had to pay the excess if they were at fault.

Brendatheblender · 03/05/2018 16:15

No idea why it says “in at”

Ragwort · 03/05/2018 16:15

Is there anything in her contract?

My DH has a company car and it is quite clear that he is responsible for a certain amount (think around £250?) if he is at fault. One of his colleagues had a prang - entirely her fault - and she will have to pay the first £250.

Pickleypickles · 03/05/2018 16:16

When theres been a bump in our work vans it always goes through the insurance. Thats the point in fleet insurance otherwise companies would make you drive on your own insurance i thought.

foobio · 03/05/2018 16:22

Even if she settles privately, the company technically still need to inform the insurers.

Morally I would also say it should be through the insurers, perhaps with her contributing part of the excess.

lizabes · 03/05/2018 16:30

It's her bad driving so she should pay.

Although it would probably would have been more appropriate for it to go through the insurers and for her to pay the excess.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page