However if the baby is transgender, she will feel that is not really a girl but a boy. She will want to do the things boys do, dress as a boy, have boy toys, have a boy's name and be referred to as he and him
This is a book directed at children, it was at my local library today and not in the "teen" section but the kids section. I don't mind children reading anything and everything as far as fiction goes but this is written as non fiction, as facts. It's telling a girl who wants to do "boy things" whatever the fuck that means she might be a boy.
People keep saying that no one is actively "transing" children, but what message does this give to children?
You can't compare this to people trying to avoid children being "turned" gay before anyone tries that one, you can't make someone want to have sex through education but you might well convince them that their gender is wrong if they don't fit in with stereotypes.
Why does it happen? No one knows why gender dysphoria happens. Some babies are born intersex, that is with genitals that are a mix of male and female. Some trans people might have all female or all male genitals but may have a different mix of hormones. Hormones are chemicals produced by glands in the the body that help is create our gender characteristics. For example testosterone helps to develop more facial and body hair and stop menstruation.
This confuses intersex conditions with transgenderism. This is pretty common as well as pretending hormones make you trans. As a woman with PCOS I take serious issue with it. It's also common for trans rights activists to use PCOS and claim it is an intersex condition, to show how supposedly common being intersex is- and then conflate the two.
The feeling of being in the wrong body can start from the age of two or three
Two FFS.
Meanwhile I'm feeling disgusted at myself because I really really want that book gone and I've never wanted a book taken out of a library before. Should I speak to the library or at least ask that they consider buying in something to give another counterargument to the book?