Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trumpwatch: Courage Calls to Courage Everywhere

976 replies

lionheart · 24/04/2018 20:00

Let's hope he is done soon. Smile

OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
cozietoesie · 01/05/2018 04:48

....setting positive records....

I see he's stopped quoting any. At last.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 05:55

What Mueller Wants to Ask Trump About Obstruction, and What It Means

The questions show the special counsel’s focus on obstruction of justice and touch on some surprising other areas.

mobile.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/us/politics/questions-mueller-wants-to-ask-trump-russia.html

Renato Mariotti
@renato_mariotti
THREAD: What do Mueller’s questions for Trump, released today by the @nytimes, tell us about his investigation? (A lot.)

1/ Today @nytimes released a list of questions that Mueller provided to Trump’s lawyers as part of their negotiations for an interview with Trump. They’re very revealing and worth a read.

2/ As a starting point, it is very unusual for a prosecutor to provide detailed questions to an interviewee in advance. Typically prosecutors want to surprise an interviewee and get his off-the-cuff responses. Getting questions in advance allows him to carefully craft answers.

3/ So why did Mueller provide the questions to Trump? An obvious answer is that Trump can refuse the interview and plead the Fifth if subpoenaed. Most people under investigation would take the Fifth, but Mueller perhaps thought this could convince Trump to sit for an interview.

4/ It might work. Another obvious question—why did someone on Trump’s team decide to release these questions to the @nytimes? Perhaps they want to convince Trump not to sit for an interview, as John Dowd tried to do before quitting Trump’s legal team.

5/ Turning to the questions, it’s worth noting that despite being detailed, these are just the high-level questions that Mueller wants to ask Trump. Mueller would obviously ask follow up questions, and those questions could be even more important.

6/ The questions are very revealing—they’re a roadmap of Mueller’s view of Trump’s potential criminal liability. Mueller is investigating additional subjects, but it’s hard to believe that he sees liability for Trump beyond the topics in these questions.

7/ The reason I’m skeptical that Mueller has evidence of liability beyond these topics right now is that he has to know that Trump might not sit for a second interview. If he doesn’t get to a topic in this initial interview, he may never get to ask it.

8/ This also raises a key question—why interview Trump now? If Mueller is still investigating many matters, he could uncover additional evidence that could lead to new questions. Is he concerned that the likelihood that Trump will agree to an interview will decrease over time?

9/ One obvious takeaway from the questions is that most of them relate in one way or another to potential obstruction of justice. This reinforces my view that Mueller will likely conclude Trump obstructed justice, which I discussed in @POLITICOMag: www.politico.com/magazine/amp/story/2018/01/26/mueller-trump-obstruction-of-justice-russia-216532

10/ Many of the questions about obstruction are highly detailed, asking about specific tweets and statements by Trump. The questions on other topics are much more vague—typically “What do you know about” a topic?

11/ This suggests to me that Mueller’s team was more guarded about topics that haven’t already been covered in the press at length. They could use the documents, emails, and other evidence they collected as “follow up” questions to these very broad/vague questions.

12/ In contrast, the questions about obstruction are detailed and focus on pinning down Trump as to his intent. Firing Comey was only obstruction of justice if Trump acted with a “corrupt” intent—in other words, with the intent to unlawfully hinder the investigation.

13/ I’ve discussed at length how Trump’s tweets and conversations could be used to prove his corrupt intent (in the @POLITICOMag piece and elsewhere), and there’s no question Trump’s team has been focused on this issue. What his team doesn’t know is what else Mueller has.

14/ What has to scare Trump’s team are broad questions like “During the campaign, what did you know about Russian hacking, use of social media or other acts aimed at the campaign?” His lawyers have to piece together what documents Mueller has and what other witnesses will say.

15/ Of all the questions on the list, the only one that comes as a surprise is this one: “What knowledge did you have of any outreach by your campaign, including by Paul Manafort, to Russia about potential assistance to the campaign?” There has been no reporting on this topic.

16/ Does that mean that Mueller has not uncovered any topics that haven’t been leaked to the media? Possibly, because Mueller finds information by interviewing witnesses that are free to speak to the media and subpoenaing documents from companies that could also talk.

17/ I think what’s most likely is that Mueller’s team was careful about showing their cards and made some of the questions/topics so broad that their best evidence will fit inside them. So the lack of detailed questions on non-obstruction topics may not mean much beyond that.

18/ I’ll have more thoughts tomorrow, including thoughts about specific questions, and I’ll read your comments and do my best to follow up. There’s too much here to cover in depth in one thread. /end

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:05

Manafort seeks court hearing on leaks

www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/04/30/manafort-court-leaks-rights-561674

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:08

Republicans draft articles of impeachment against Rod Rosenstein

www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/rod-rosenstein-articles-impeachment-republicans-congress-robert-mueller-a8330321.html

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:15

Trump campaign has paid portions of Michael Cohen's legal fees: Sources

abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trump-campaign-paid-portions-michael-cohens-legal-fees/story

The Trump campaign has spent nearly $228,000 to cover some of the legal expenses for President Donald Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen, sources familiar with the payments tell ABC News, raising questions about whether the Trump campaign may have violated campaign finance laws.

Federal Election Commission records show three payments made from the Trump campaign to a firm representing Cohen. The “legal consulting” payments were made to McDermott Will and Emery — a law firm where Cohen's attorney Stephen Ryan is a partner — between October 2017 and January 2018.

It was those three payments, sources tell ABC News, that were related to Cohen’s legal defense.

Cohen has said that he did not have a formal role in the Trump campaign, and it is illegal to spend campaign funds for personal use – defined by the FEC as payments for expenses “that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s campaign or responsibilities as a federal officeholder.”

"They're on shaky legal ground," said Stephen Spaulding, chief of strategy at the nonprofit watchdog group Common Cause. "It sounds like they are really pushing the envelope … If the campaign were to say they are campaign-related payments, then maybe it's okay to use campaign funds. But he can't have it both ways."

Legal experts told ABC News that if the payments referenced in the FEC filings are related to the Russia investigation, they likely wouldn't violate campaign finance law, as the investigation is related to the 2016 presidential campaign. If the payments are related to the Stormy Daniels matter, however, the campaign could have a problem.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:23

Jill Stein Has Turned Over Hundreds Of Documents To Congress As Part Of The Russia Probe

Stein says the many of the documents her campaign turned over were communications with RT, a media outlet that US authorities have dubbed a Russian propaganda network.

www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/emmaloop/jill-stein-has-handed-over-hundreds-of-documents-to

Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein says she and her campaign have finished turning over hundreds of documents to the top congressional committee investigating Russian election interference in 2016 — but she is refusing to hand over some documents that she argues are protected by the Constitution.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:25

Stormy Daniels sues Trump for defamation over 'con job' tweet

She says she was harmed by a Trump tweet that accused her of 'a con job

www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna870171

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:27

Bank of Internet, Which Had Been Under Federal Investigation, Appears In Multiple Kushner Deals

The bank most recently played a role in a transaction involving a Kushner Companies loan in Brooklyn.

www.propublica.org/article/bank-of-internet-kushner-deals

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:31

Josh Gerstein
@joshgerstein
NEW: DOJ's watchdog says an unnamed FBI agent leaked, lied and mishandled classified. Then he apparently retired while under investigation. Could fuel claims of double-standard with Andy McCabe, whose firing thwarted his planned retirement

www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2018/04/30/fbi-leaks-lies-classified-560934

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:35

Jim Acosta
@Acosta
Source close to Trump says National Enquirer story on Michael Cohen appears to be a strong sign the president is turning against his personal attorney. Asked whether a message is being sent, Cohen replied: “what do you think.”

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:38

Russians followed up on Trump Tower meeting after election, Democrats say

amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/04/27/politics/russians-trump-team-magnitsky-act/index.html

Jim Sciutto
@jimsciutto
Emails and texts from Russians just after the election undermine Trump team claims there was no follow-up to June 2016 meeting.

cozietoesie · 01/05/2018 06:43

I'm not concerned about the fact that Mr M's team have prepared questions. Smile It's what I would expect.

cozietoesie · 01/05/2018 06:45

Cohen replied what??

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 06:52

Exclusive: U.S. EPA grants biofuels waiver to billionaire Icahn's oil refinery - sources

mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1I10YB

Sarah Kendzior
@sarahkendzior
Billionaire corporate raider Carl Icahn, who is supposed to be under investigation for abuse of power while serving in the Trump admin, granted a "financial hardship waiver" by the EPA

Carl Icahn is one of the Trump admin associates whose status I see as a litmus test of accountability. That he's still doing the same shady shit despite an investigation into his crimes is a very bad sign. August 2017 thread on Icahn:

mobile.twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/898688971282288640

cozietoesie · 01/05/2018 07:00

Not so good. It looks as if Pruitt will go but unfortunately, this will likely stay. Sad

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 07:02

Michael Wilner
@mawilner
#Israel operation findings “consistent with what the United States has long known,” White House says: “#Iran has a robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program that it has tried and failed to hide.”

Present tense.

The White House tells me it has corrected its statement: #Iran had, not has, a “robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program.”

Elliott Lusztig
@ezlusztig
For 1 hour and 58 minutes today, the US gov't officially accused Iran of secretly building nuclear weapons, a revelation that would throw the region into chaos and probably lead to war.

At the end of that 1 hour and 58 minutes, they took it back: "Clerical error."

Because this administration is drowning in scandal and chaos, it is extremely unlikely that enough public scrutiny can be mobilized to demand an explanation for how something so shocking and dangerous could have occurred.

What do we call that in 2018? Monday.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 07:03

An EPA whistleblower says that Scott Pruitt was "bald-faced lying" when he told members of Congress that no EPA employees were retaliated against for raising concerns about his spending decisions.

abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/exclusive-epa-whistleblower-pruitt-bald-faced-lied-congress/story

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 01/05/2018 07:06

Documents show ties between university, conservative donors

apnews.com/amp/0c87e4318bcc4eb9b8e69f9f54c7b889

Virginia's largest public university granted the conservative Charles Koch Foundation a say in the hiring and firing of professors in exchange for millions of dollars in donations, according to newly released documents.

The release of donor agreements between George Mason University and the foundation follows years of denials by university administrators that Koch foundation donations inhibit academic freedom.

University President Angel Cabrera wrote a note to faculty Friday night saying the agreements "fall short of the standards of academic independence I expect any gift to meet." The admission came three days after a judge scrutinized the university's earlier refusal to release any documents.

The newly released agreements spell out million-dollar deals in which the Koch Foundation endows a fund to pay the salary of one or more professors at the university's Mercatus Center, a free-market think tank. The agreements require creation of five-member selection committees to choose the professors and grant the donors the right to name two of the committee members.

The Koch Foundation enjoyed similar appointment rights to advisory boards that had the right under the agreements to recommend firing a professor who failed to live up to standards.

Cabrera emphasized in his note to faculty that the "agreements did not give donors control over academic decisions" — an apparent reference to the fact that the Koch Foundation did not control a majority of seats on the selection committees.

A university spokesman said Cabrera was unavailable for an interview. On Monday night, Cabrera issued a statement saying he is ordering a review of all the university's donor agreements that support faculty positions to "ensure that they do not grant donors undue influence in academic matters." [...]

cozietoesie · 01/05/2018 07:09

....What do we call that in 2018?....

We call that 'sweating on a possible PP. (45 has got to tamp down his base's bad thoughts about Iran.)

lionheart · 01/05/2018 07:48

One letter matters a great deal.

Michael Wilner
‏Verified account
@mawilner

#Israel operation findings “consistent with what the United States has long known,” White House says: “#Iran has a robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program that it has tried and failed to hide.”

Present tense.

Michael Wilner
‏Verified account
@mawilner

The White House tells me it has corrected its statement: #Iran had, not has, a “robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program.”

OP posts:
lionheart · 01/05/2018 07:56

Manafort again.

money

(Reuters) - A bankruptcy trustee has filed a lawsuit against Paul Manafort in California alleging that he falsely claimed he was a creditor owed $2.7 million in a failed real estate deal with his former son-in-law.

OP posts:
cozietoesie · 01/05/2018 07:57

Indeed. Iran is going to be presented, soon enough, as a SUCCESS. (Mission accomplished etc.) Wink

OP posts:
OP posts:
cozietoesie · 01/05/2018 08:01

Oops. Wink

Swipe left for the next trending thread