Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

for wanting to walk in the park without being bounced on by giant b*stard dogs?

292 replies

bohemianbint · 11/05/2007 16:22

Shouldn't people keep an eye on their fricking dogs and not let them run all over parks and scare the crap out of people? Was subjected to about 5 minutes fending the world's biggest dog off before the stupid bitch of an owner came sauntering round the corner. Don't people understand that just because they think their dog is great doesn't mean anyone else does?

OP posts:
whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 10:57

Connie - really - didn't they? Have you read the thread? Squonk, BohemianBint, Kimi, Kerela and GreebosWhiskers would probably disagree with you. Or are you going to dismiss all our opinions as 'full of it' as well.

yellowrose · 13/05/2007 11:03

agree. i hate big vicious-looking dogs as was bitten and attacked on 2 occassions when a child. am now so paranoid have asked people what to do if god forbid ds gets attacked by one. my favourite was shove a stick or pen up its arse, as it will force it to let go. very difficult to get a dog off when it has its jaws locked. of course it may then turn round and bite YOUR arm right off, but i would do anything at all to get a dog off my child and don't care if i get attacked if it will save my son. i have considered carrying a knife and would buy a gun if it were legal as a weapon against a dangerous dogs. quite happy to go to prison for carrying a dangerous weapon if it saves my son.

too many children are killed in this country by dogs who have owners who are too selfish and stupid. we are a country of fecking dog lovers, that is the problem. in other countries notice how small children are adored and picked up and hugged by total strangers (i have just come back from Spain where every waiter would pick up ds and show him around the restaurant and give him a toy) over here we treat dogs better than children. it is dogs that get hugged and patted on the head over here. you work it out !

chocolateteapot · 13/05/2007 11:12

I don't hate dogs, I quite like them and have had discussions with DH about getting one, we're not going to though.

It's definitely irresponsible dog owners that get me. There are loads of dogs round here and the majority are well trained and their owners seem to be very aware that bouncing dogs ARE scary for small children. There are a couple of lovely people that will always stop when their dogs are on the lead for DS & DD to stroke.

I do object to the complete idiots who are completely clueless and to DD having had an over enthusiastic border collie land on her lap when she was in her buggy aged about 2, and who sort of muttered an apology and cruised off leaving me with a squashed, dishevelled, scared DD.

And if a dog owner can't understand that a bouncing dog is intimidating for a toddler and take steps to prevent an incident where a child does end up terrified by the dog, as many many dog owners seem to manage to avoid, then I don't think they should be allowed to own a dog .

ConnieDescending · 13/05/2007 11:21

WMMC - didn't they what? I'm not dismissing opinions btw I am responding to some of the totally over the top 'opinions' contained in this thread......like those of yellowrose!

Yellowrose, I think your time would be better spent trying to get help with your dog phobia and helping your son appreciate and understand animals than planning how to stab a dog up its arse in the event of a savage attack. Carrying a weapon? Are you serious?

ConnieDescending · 13/05/2007 11:25

and its not just 'big vicious looking dogs' that are on the look out to attack your child at any given opportunity. Best keep your gun handy for those yorkshire terriers as well.

whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 11:27

"Chocolate, nobody mentioned dogs savaging children"

jampot · 13/05/2007 11:29

no unreasonable at all - im not a dog lover, i dont want to pet someone else's treasure nor do i want to dodge the shit

whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 11:31

The Office of National Statistics records the number of deaths caused by dangerous dogs as an average of 2.3 a year from 1999 to 2005. More than 3,000 people are recorded injured by dogs each year but many more incidents, like Samantha's bite, go unreported'

Lizzylou · 13/05/2007 11:31

I have been scared of dogs since I was a child (2 overzealous dogs who jumped up and knocked me down and clambered all over me when I was v young), I really try not to pass this on to my DS's.
However, I think a healthy "respect" of dogs is good, I would rather they were not too fond of dogs that they run up and stroke every dog that they see.
I too think that dogs should be on leads in public places, particularly in parks and owners should clear up their dog's sh*t too.
There is a major problem with some owners, who are just selfish and thoughtless tbh, like the woman at DS1's preschool who brings her bull terrier thing and ties him up right by the bloomin entrance so you can't avoid the slathering dog when collecting your child.
Just because you love your dogs, don't expect every one else to.

whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 11:37

and I wouldn't fancy your chances in the US either:

A survey by the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta ("CDC") concluded that dogs bite nearly 2% of the U.S. population

ConnieDescending · 13/05/2007 11:42

WMMC - I'm not sure what you are trying to debate with me? I am not denying that dogs haven't injured and killed children - hence the dangerous dog act. That of course is terrible and tragic (but usually the owners fault).

There is a huge difference between this and dogs knocking into toddlers in a playful manner at the park is there not?

My dd was scratched nastly by a cat recently (we are not a cat loving family) but I didnt over react and go off on one about nasty evil manky cats - instead we talked about why it might have happened etc and that not all cats are evil creatures intent on harm.

I think its a good thing that children are taught to respect animals and how/ when to approach them. A responsible owner will always want their dogs to socialise with people because thats how as a puppy they learn to be with people.

I don't care if people like or don't like my dogs but without socialising them as puppies, they wouldn't be the well behaved dogs they are today around people.

SpawnChorus · 13/05/2007 11:45

Connie - you really are a one-trick pony, aren't you?

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnn

whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 11:53

The first step in a dog attack is often a dog approaching a small child though Connie.

I was attacked by a very large dog that ran up to me. I stood still and the owner said, don't woory he won't bite. Next minute he sank his teeth into my elbow severing veins and crushing bone in my arm AND I KNEW I HAD TO STAY THERE TILL HE LET GO BECAUSE ONCE HE LET GO I KNEW I WAS GOING TO HAVE AN ARTERIAL BLEED.

Also he was likely to go for my neck next - he came up to my chest in height.

His owner came within one minute and called him off and, an animal lover I believed it was a one off and let it go.

The next week the dog attacked a toddler who is now scarred for life.

This was not a dog with a history of violence. Nor was it a vicious breed. But good dogs do sometimes go bad.

So personally I wouldn't have a poorly evolved wolf around with kids myself. If you choose to, that's your lookout, just keep away from the parents and kids you find so loathesome won't you?

whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 11:55

Oh and yes cats are evil, vindictive vicious beasts. That's why I have them Connie . They remind me of you.

ConnieDescending · 13/05/2007 12:03

WMMC - or a small child approaching a dog? I cannot comment on your particular experience which must have been terribly traumatic. But, I still advocate that a well trained dog is an asset to a family and not a danger. If you strongly feel that all dogs are dangerous then I would advise you to try to get some help with this rather than assume all dogs are going to do the same thing. Incidentally, if my dogs were to do anything at all that would lead me to believe they were not 'safe' to be around, I wou;ld have no qualms in putting them down immediatley.

Spawn - I'm not sure what you think your comments will achieve? I have strong opinions on this topic, if you disagree with me then state your case instead of adding a dull inane comment that has no purpose to the dicussion.

KerryMum · 13/05/2007 12:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ConnieDescending · 13/05/2007 12:06

WMMC - what made you think that was an appropriate comment to write?

ipanemagirl · 13/05/2007 12:13

I think dogs should be on leads in public - their rights shouldn't come before our childrens' rights to not be knocked over and licked on the face by some horrid dog.

Of course their owners love them. I loved dogs when we were young. But we lived on a farm where there was space and our dog was WELL TRAINED.

About 1% of dogs I see now are well trained.l They seem to be proto-babies for their owners which is why they get away with murder - I think that's wrong, they're animals and out of control animals are a massive public nuisance!

Blondilocks · 13/05/2007 12:19

I hate it too. I don't particularly like dogs, especially strangers ones. They may be friendly to their owners but who knows how they'll be to strangers.

I particularly hate it when out running & there are loose dogs.

Blandmum · 13/05/2007 12:29

Connie, we avoid lots of 'other environments' with ds. Do you feel that we need to avoid parks too?

And the reason that being on a lead is an issue, is that the dog, with its allergens does not bound up to ds and trigger his asthma. They need to be close to him you see.

And when dogs are off the leash, they often do come up to him. And this does trigger his asthma.

Parks should first be for people. Then dogs. And to facilitate this dogs should be on leads.

I love dogs very much. I cant stand it when people put dogs before humans though

Blandmum · 13/05/2007 12:30

and btw, under British law cat owners are not responsible for their cat's behaviour. Dog owners are

Lizzylou · 13/05/2007 12:30

God yes, Blondilocks, they just see you as a moving target then! I run around a resevoir where there are notices everywhere that dogs should be on leads and even a big space especially for dogs to be let off the leash seperate to everywhere else and still I manage to double my run by constantly dodging bloody dogs.

Saggarmakersbottomknocker · 13/05/2007 12:33

Connie - I agree with you - a well trained dog can be an asset. But as that dog approaches you how can you know? I think the safest thing (for both myself and the dog) is to assume they aren't well trained until proved otherwise.

I was bitten by the leader of a pack of Jack Russells. It was unprovoked - walked past their gate - continued walking, no eye contact - they basically rounded on me. They'll have bitten before I'm absolutely sure of it, and will again.

whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 12:40

Ahw shucks Connie, don't be offended, I love my cats dearly

whomovedmychocolate · 13/05/2007 12:42

Kerrymum - firstly I was 14 at the time and a vegan and thought I was 'protecting' the animal by insisting my parents didn't report it. Secondly the owner insisted it must have been something I'd done to provoke it and I didn't know any better. In retrospect I feel very guilty I didn't.

Swipe left for the next trending thread