Universities can't be more flexible as they have formal examination boards at set times. Can you imagine trying to convene examination boards, preceded by mit circs panels, for each individual student's personal timeline and maintain anonymity? It would be impossible
OP I'm trying to get your timeline straight.
You were admitted to the university in September 2016 as a first year student
You failed 6 summative assignments in your first year, resubmitted 5 of the assignments in the August 2017 resit period as a second attempt, capped mark of 40.
You requested mitigation for the 6th assignment for medical reasons and subsequently submitted the Assignment in September 2017. There seems to be some confusion about what happened here.
You have been allowed to progress to the second year but have since been told there is additional outstanding work from your first year that you need to complete
Questions:
Did you request, and get given, an extension for the 6th Assignment and submit before the extended deadline as well as requesting mitigation?
Did you request mitigation for all the Assignments in this period?
Did you request mitigation for your first attempts at the assignments?
Are you registered with University disability support services for your health issues? You say the University is aware and therefore you should have been referred (duty of care, Equality Act)
This other assignment that is apparently missing. What is this from?
Did you receive 120 academic credits for your first year? (You should be able to access an interim, ratified transcript). If you are missing more than 20 credits you should not have been allowed to progress.
Do you have contemporaneous evidence of your health problems relating to period of the missing assignment?
Looking at this from the perspective of someone who deals with appeals professionally for a University I see a number of issues that I would want to bottom out.
- What did the University know about your health issues and when? Was appropriate support provided and taken up?
- Were you advised appropriately about mitigation and extensions? I would think that an extension for your 6th assignment in the August 2017 period would have been appropriate, possibly also with mitigation. But not solely mitigation
- Was mitigation requested and applied appropriately when the assignments were first taken? It may have been possible for the first attempt to be discounted and the attempt in the resit period to have been considered a first attempt with no mark cap.
- What is this missing assignment? Would it be reasonable to assume that you knew about it? Should you have been allowed to progress to the second year carrying this credit requirement given the potential additional stress it may cause? Should you have been allowed to progress under the regulations of the University.
Finally, if your appeal is upheld the University will try to find a resolution that puts you back in the position you were before the error occurred.
My personal view is that if the University knew about your health issues when you first took the assignments you should have been advised to submit a mitigation request. You should then have been allowed a resit as a first attempt opportunity in August. You should have requested and been granted an extension for any assignments due whilst in hospital. You should have been referred to disability services, counselling services and occupational health if there is a fit to study policy. You should also have been encouraged to apply for an (retrospective) interruption and started your first year again given all your health issues.
Other things to note - not seeking help is not usually acceptable mitigation (I know this sucks for mental health issues). Not being registered with a local GP and therefore not having medical evidence is not acceptable for mitigation. Evidence that isn't contemporaneous with the period concerned is not usually accepted. Evidence that could reasonably have been presented at the time as part of a mitigation request is not usually accepted. Requesting mitigation under the Appeals process when there isn't a good reason as to why you didn't request it prior to your deadline isn't usually accepted.
Seek advice from the Students Union. I doubt a solicitor will be much use. They don't add a lot to the process in my experience.
Read all the relevant policies and procedures. Get your timeline and evidence straight
Good luck