Anyone who gets them now will continue to get them. It affects those coming up as far as I understand from what I've read. The earning threshold does seem low, but then families on such a low income do get additional financial help. So really they should take into account total family income when working out the threshold as there will be some families much worse off (earn more but get less additional financial help etc)
Upto Year 2 is still free for all children isn't it?
The free school meals previously did seem somewhat vague. I am a single mum of 5 and on a low wage but I suppose just over the threshold to receive this. Mind take packed lunch as I certainly cannot afford them all a school dinner. But I have a friend who receives free school meals yet her husband earns more than twice what I do (she doesn't work). So I have no idea how this would be? Shouldn't it be based on family income and not one persons income (mother doesn't work so I guess it was due to this).
End of the day, our government should be looking out for the wellbeing of children whose parents cannot afford them a proper dinner. There are lots of reception to Year 2 children at my ds school whose parents can afford this no problem. My children get a cooked dinner by me everyday even though things are very tight financially. But I can afford to feed them. I would rather my reception child's free dinner goes to a child who would not otherwise get one.