Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU too feel that customers were right in voting with their feet.

30 replies

worridmum · 19/01/2018 17:28

Someone in a town local to me brought up a couple of gyms in 2017, which sadly have now closed as of this last week, for the reason of lack of customers. Apparently when the new owner purchased them they were profitable and had rough gender ratio of 60/40 male to female members.

The new owner decided that they wanted to increase the number of women attending their gyms so brought in a policy of woman only hours between 4pm and 8pm Monday to Friday and Saturday 9am-4pm. But instead of offering male members a discount because all the prime hours had become female they expected the males users to pay the same membership rates as the female yet being locked out from using the gym in prime time.

So when the predicted drop of the male clientele (why would you pay for a gym your not allowed to use) happened, instead of adjusting the problem possibly looking at altering the woman hours to attempt to win back her customer base (as in maybe reducing the number of days or hours that were woman only as all prime time is a bit much). She went on a massive rant to the local press suggesting that her clients were sexist pigs for leaving her set of gyms in droves, which basically pushed the majority of the remaining male members to unsubscribe and only reversing this policy 9 months after implementing it after the damage had been done.

AIBU too feel that the owner caused her own business to fail by treating a large portion of her clientele badly rather then the town being a massive den of sexist pigs as she claimed in the local news this week when she closed her gyms permanently as the woman who joined up after this policy was implemented did no were near cover the loss of the ones she lost as she apparently had only predicting a lose of 5% to 10% of her male customer bases despite them being locked out of all the peak times of the gym while not even getting a discount to reflect the limited time they could use it.

AIBU to think she brought this situation on herself and to have lost most of my sympathy for her after she went on a massive rant about how sexist the town is for voting with their feet and not supporting her local run business.

OP posts:
FlameCrestedTanager · 19/01/2018 18:27

That also has the potential to lose female customers. DH and I go to the gym together (he drives, I don't - also we enjoy going together). If he could no longer go before 8pm then neither of us would be able to go, so we'd both have to leave. There are lots of male/female couples in the classes we go to who obviously use the gym as combination exercise/time together. Bizarre idea.

AndromedaPerseus · 19/01/2018 18:57

I'm sure if she banned women rather than men during peak hours there would soon be a sex discrimination case being pursued

CaoNiMa · 19/01/2018 19:18

The blokes should all have claimed they "identified as women". Problem solved!

LyraPotter · 19/01/2018 19:34

I'm in favour of having times that are reserved for women only but it seems like the balance wasn't right on this one.

000bourneFarm · 19/01/2018 19:35

Well, in that case OP.

I'm out as Deborah Meaden would say. Good luck.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread