Lancashire County Council closed a large number of libraries last year. The so-called "public consultation" was a sham as basically public comments etc were ignored. They claimed to encourage local community groups to take them over and run them as "community assets", but the Council officials wouldn't respond to letters, phone calls nor emails from local groups asking for information. One library in particular, the same council had spent nearly £300k renovating the year before, and it was then earmarked for closure less than a year later! The council was reported to the Communities Secretary who is on record as considering a formal enquiry into the actions of the County Council due to lack of transparency of reasoning/rationale in which libraries were closed and why.
Luckily, a change in the political leadership of the council following May's County Council elections has meant that the new council has been re-opening many of the closed libraries, and giving more support to a few that were taken over by local community groups. The one the previous Council spent £300k on the year before closure is being re-opened shortly.
Sadly, I think that politics are to play in a lot of closures. Perhaps it's just a coincidence that many of the closures were in areas which traditionally vote against the ruling party at the time of the closures?? It's not as if they saved much money - from what I can gather, many of the staff were simply redeployed in other libraries and the buildings were just mothballed so continued to need insurance, alarms, rates, maintenance, etc.
At a time when we're falling down international educational league tables, and when rural services are being run down (i.e. shop/post office closures, fewer buses etc), rural libraries are more essential than ever and the costs are tiny compared with the benefits.