It's like anything in life, it's all about priorities, and for us, preparing for old age was something we thought about years ago.
There is nothing quite like the smugness of the fortunate.
In the 1960 my father took a risk by joining an obscure American typewriter company while a friend got a superb job designing blast furnaces. By the end of the 90s IBM had turned out to be the better bet. Was the engineer at fault?
Up to 1979 it was an entirely legitimate and sensible choice to go for renting your property to be assured of a secure home in a pleasant environment. Fortune has not favoured those who did.
Until about 1992 the sensible money piled into endowment mortgages: I recall being jeered at for my foolish conservatism in not having one. Thereafter they have not looked so clever.
And what about BonusPrint which ran a stable and gave prize money lavishly and within five years disappeared when camera film simply disappeared?
I'd be interested to know what proportion of your accumulated wealth, SusannahL comes from simply having lived in a house. My eldest sister 'earned' more in one house move in the 1990s than the entirety of what my third sister owns. The first one has an HND, works in advertising and has never contributed to a pension. She has a comfortable retirement in prospect. The third sister has a PhD, works at a high level in public service and has contributed to a pension since she was 22. She is worried about what will happen when she stops work.
So which of my sisters would you have been SusannahL? Which specific choices have you made to deserve your luck? And how well insulated are you in the event of a debilitating disease, the death of a child, blindness or divorce?
The link between choice and poverty is not so concrete as the political right would have us believe.