So we are looking to move house. We rent. We want a house on a particular estate and luckily can wait for the right one to come up as we don't have to leave our current house in any hurry. The houses are all basically the same house, two roads of terraces, some have a downstairs loo, other don't. A few have conservatories added, some have the wall between the kitchen and dining room knocked through. But essentially all the same apart from decor.
I've been looking at the prices they're being rented out as, and have realised lovely ones with brand new high spec kitchens, nice wood floors, nice bathrooms etc, are going for the exact same price as ones with not very nice old kitchens, garish carpet and in need of new windows.
I've mentioned to a few people, included estate agents, that it doesn't seem to make sense for the much nicer insides to be the same price as the not so nice ones, and have been told interiors don't matter as much with rentals as they do when buying, and don't affect the pricing the same way.
Does this make sense to others? Have I been wrongly informed? If you're buying you have more control over changing an unattractive flooring or doing up a kitchen than you do with a rental. I wouldn't mind paying a bit more rent for a house with a nicer interior or better kitchen. I'm sure others feel the same. Am I wrong? Totally happy to be told I'm unreasonable if I've missed some vital part of the equation.