Our family attend a support group for children dealing with a particular health condition and their families.
The proposed trip at Christmas this year is to a trampoline park an hour's drive away at £15 a head. We have four dc.
A "ladies' night" for the mums, again an hour away involving an overnight stay and cocktail making classes is also in the pipeline. It will cost at least £200.
We can't afford to join in. But compared to many families we have good jobs.
My opinion is that the expensive activities in inaccessible locations are excluding a lot of families and making it a group for a minority of well off people.
The committee's opinion is that when activities are subsidised, people turn up for a free day out but don't come to the regular meets.So they will no longer subsidise activities.
My opinion is that those who can't afford a day out need support the most. And that the group is making these people more isolated by effectively excluding them.
I have fed this back to the committee and everyone hates me for it. I've been accused of making people feel greedy and awful when all they want us a break from the daily grind. And their opinion is that the activities are reasonable and that people just prioritise spending differently.
I don't want activities subsidised for my family but for people who really couldn't join in anything.
AIBU to think activities should be accessible to all?