In the wee hours of last night the Keeping Kids Safe volunteer group (who pose as children online to discover sexual predators) confronted two suspected paedophiles in my local area on their doorsteps. The incidents were posted on Facebook Live as they happened, and the men were arrested by the police.
I think the group does good work, and clearly the men need to be brought to police attention. But they both have families and children, who were caught up in the backlash.
The wives (and child in one case) learned of their loved ones' wrongdoing on video, with their devastation displayed live for hundreds of viewers. By morning their neighbors, classmates and colleagues had all seen the videos and the spouses had received abuse and death threats. The families are now in undisclosed locations under police protection.
I'm not advocating any kind of sympathy for sex offenders, and I'm glad they were caught.
AIBU to think that the live posts were unnecessary? Certainly the confrontation should be recorded as evidence and given to the police. But that could be done without publicly humiliating innocent bystanders and exposing them to risk before the police have had a chance to investigate?