I need opinions on this as on discussion with my other colleagues it seems we are all divided.
I work in a retail banking industry part time for example 20 hours a week, my time is salary paid but I have contracted hours so say 9-5 Monday with 1 hour unpaid lunch break. If I work more hours than my contracted hours, for an example an extra day in the week 11-3 so 4 hours, I would be paid for this. On full days I am paid from 9-5 which are the opening hours, however I am required to arrive in enough time to get the money out the safe, tills on, general pre-opening prep. This all needs to be completed before 9am and takes a minimum of 15 minutes to do. Similar on an evening, the door is locked at 5pm we are not allowed to complete closing procedures until this has happened so usually don't leave until 5.15pm. This is an extra 30 minutes a day which isn't a lot but after doing this for 3 years multiple times a week I have come to realise I have in theory worked a lot of time that I haven't been paid for. My other colleagues are of the opinion that it's not fair but it's just what we have to do, I am happy to do this but I just think we should be paid for it. AIBU?
I should add that this time is non-negotiable, I can't just rock up at 8.58 and leave at 5.01.
I am completely prepared to be told I am being naive or unreasonable also.