Mumsnet Logo
My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To wonder how this is legal

12 replies

Bluepansies · 02/08/2017 17:20

I've just seen a TV ad for a company offering loans at 1035% apr. I thought the one I saw the other day that was 79% apr was bad enough but this is insane - surely you'd have to be in a pretty desperate financial situation to go for this in which case this is unbelievably exploitative. The only other reason I can think of for someone to take one out is if they were very inexperienced and/or uneducated when it comes to finances in which case it's equally exploitative.

How is this allowed?

OP posts:
Report

AnnetteCurtains · 02/08/2017 17:22

It shouldn't be
Disgraceful

Report

VisitorFromAlphaStation · 02/08/2017 17:24

I wonder this too. I spotted an article from 2012 where the offered interest rate was 23707 apr, and another article from 2010 an interest rate of 75862 apr was offered, according to that article.

Report

Floggingmolly · 02/08/2017 17:26

They're aimed at people who can't actually access credit elsewhere.

Report

MaidOfStars · 02/08/2017 17:26

surely you'd have to be in a pretty desperate financial situation to go for this
Yep.

in which case this is unbelievably exploitative
I don't think these loans are designed to be held for a year. Most people might reason that, in a tight spot, paying a fiver a week to borrow a hundred for a month is a pretty decent deal. That works out at !200% APR.

I'm not necessarily defending these types of loans, and I think there are many defaulters (quite simply because a fiver a week for a hundred borrowed over a month doesn't seem like a bad term to default on) but I think the phrase "payday" loans should be borne in mind.

Report

c3pu · 02/08/2017 17:29

YANBU, there should be a cap on the amount of interest that can be charged.

Inevitably it is the most vulnerable who will be taking out these kind of loans... It amounts to little more than a tax on being poor. Sickening.

Report

SerfTerf · 02/08/2017 17:31

That's eyewatering.

What was the company name?

Report

Bluepansies · 02/08/2017 17:34

I can't remember the name of it but it featured a man folded up in a cardboard box. The 79% one was Amigo loans I think, they offer loans to people with bad credit as long as they have a guarantor. I think they're up to 5 or 10 grand so definitely designed to be held for more than a year! Awful.

OP posts:
Report

DonaldStott · 02/08/2017 17:38

It's an absolute disgrace and I wish it would be banned.

Report

MaidOfStars · 02/08/2017 17:40

Anyone have any thoughts about microfinance in third world countries?

Report

FayKnights · 02/08/2017 17:57

I've wondered that, it's smacks of legalised loan sharking, yet if have good credit you are offered 0% credit for anything up to 40 months. It's a crazy system.

Report

KanielOutis · 02/08/2017 18:01

They are high risk, short term loans for people who have ruined their credit ratings with conventional credit. They work in £ not %, but are obliged to advertise the %. Say costs £5 to borrow £20.

Report

SerfTerf · 02/08/2017 18:45

@KanielOutis

You're not making much sense.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

Sign up to continue reading

Mumsnet's better when you're logged in. You can customise your experience and access way more features like messaging, watch and hide threads, voting and much more.

Already signed up?