Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

"Use By" Dates

29 replies

TwoDrifters · 25/07/2017 09:40

Please help settle an argument that has arisen in our home repeatedly over the years…

I maintain that if food hasn't been used on or by the "use by" date - it should sadly be thrown away.

DH asserts that if you've cooked the item on its "use by" date, then it can safely be stored in the fridge and consumed up to 2-3 days later.

We are talking about things like fresh chicken and raw prawns, things I deem a little "dangerous" for want of a better word!

Who is correct, please, oh wise Mumsnetters? (I am prepared to hang my head in shame at the amount of food wastage over the years if it is me!) Blush

OP posts:
IdentifiesAsASloth · 25/07/2017 09:41

I tend to go with your DHs thinking. No idea if that is the correct government advice but it's not killed me yet.

Synecdoche · 25/07/2017 09:42

I'm with your DH!

Phosphorus · 25/07/2017 09:44

Your husband is right.

Otherwise all those Christmas turkeys dated 25th Dec. would be pretty useless.

You have to use common sense even with the 'use by' dates.

Stuff doesn't go off at the stroke of midnight.

Although I've had stuff go funny long before the use by. So it works both ways.

Quartz2208 · 25/07/2017 09:44

use by means it needs to be cooked on that day - after that it can be safely stored and eaten based on the storage guidelines for cooked meat.

So in effect you are both right, if it has been cooked on or by the use by date it has been used. He is right that once you have cooked it the use by date has been fulfilled and then its the next set of criteria and hygenie that comes into play

Alicia555 · 25/07/2017 09:50

I do the same as you op, I suffered from a bad case of campylobacter a couple of years ago so I'd rather buy some new food then risk becoming I'll again.

chloesmumtoo · 25/07/2017 09:57

Your dh is right. We would cook up meat on its last day and then store for 3 days once cooked too.

Ameliablue · 25/07/2017 10:00

Your dh is right.

Pengggwn · 25/07/2017 10:14

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MaximaDeWit · 25/07/2017 10:18

I would also do what your DH does. Cook it on the use by date, make sure it's chilled as per guidelines, stored for 2 days max and then thrown away if not eaten (or put out for the fox).

Kailoer · 25/07/2017 10:23

Your DH is right

Why would you argue about something like this for years when you can just check general health and food safety guideliens

your thinking is being on autopilot and extremely wasteful!

(apart from anything, many restaurants pre-cook food - in fact it helps some food, e.g. chilli or a stew, it's better when it's been cooked and left overnight to develop flavour.. presumably you'd chuck it away if the batch hadn't been consumed by its original uncooked use by date? Hmm)

Kailoer · 25/07/2017 10:24

You have to use common sense

Exactly this! What did humans do before little manufacturer labels... they use their good judgement, sense of smell and go from there!

elessar · 25/07/2017 10:40

Your DH is right.

Plus to be honest, common sense should apply. Just because something says use by, doesn't mean it's not good for a day or two after that - you should be able to judge by the smell.

thefairyfellersmasterstroke · 25/07/2017 10:46

Yep, DH is right, and as elessar says, many foods are fine past their date. If it looks and smells normal, it's probably safe to eat.

TwoDrifters · 25/07/2017 10:48

It's almost unanimous, then. I am an idiot. I shall apologise profusely when he gets home tonight.

Thanks, all!

OP posts:
KoolKoala07 · 25/07/2017 10:50

I use the 'use by' very loosely. I regularly eat yoghurts 2 weeks after use by and to date it's never made me ill.

DramaAlpaca · 25/07/2017 10:51

I'm with your DH too, and so is my DS who is a chef so very conscious of food safety.

woundedbutwalking · 25/07/2017 11:14

Your DH is right as PP's have said. Also worth mentioning that food on it's use by date can be safely frozen/defrosted & cooked.

TheTurnOfTheScrew · 25/07/2017 11:21

yes, agree with your DH. Although IMO the most important thing is to trust your senses. In the past week I've eaten sausages that were a couple of days out of date, and also thrown away some fish that was several days within its use-by date, but really did not smell right when I opened the packet.

MusicToMyEars800 · 25/07/2017 11:24

I do the same as your DH, and actualy quite often eat lots of foods that are past the use by date, I haven't been ill from doing things this way so will continue to do so.

paradoxicalInterruption · 25/07/2017 11:27

Yep, cook it or freeze it.

Use a bit of common sense - sometimes things can have been stored badly in the shop or at home so I wouldn't...

PinkHeart5911 · 25/07/2017 11:30

You do just have to use your common sense

Yes I'd cook "use by" fresh meat or fish and keep in the fridge for dinner the next day or batch cook for freezing. Also on the "use by" day you could freeze it and defrost to use at a later date so you aren't being wasteful and throwing food out.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 25/07/2017 11:54

I'm afraid I agree with your dh - I would cook things and store them for a bit longer. But then I did grow up before the days of Use By and Best Before dates, and learned from my mum how to judge whether food was OK or not. I do use things that have passed their Use By/Best Before dates, providing they look and smell OK, and have never had a problem.

It's worth remembering that these dates will be deliberately conservative - the manufacturers will want to give themselves a bit of leeway, so that they can be as sure as possible that the food will still be OK up to the Use By/Best Before dates - if they cut it too fine, too often, they will find people bringing back food that has gone off before or on the Use By date, and demanding refunds - so they build a bit of extra time into their dates - if that makes sense.

TwoDrifters · 25/07/2017 11:58

Just sent DH the link to this thread. He is going to be so smug. But fair enough. Smile

OP posts:
Bringmewineandcake · 25/07/2017 12:06

This issue was on eat well for less once. The scientist they interviewed said that they will deliberately set the use by date earlier then it's absolute end date. So maybe it'll say use within 7 days when scientific evidence has shown it needs using within 10 days.

Redsippycup · 25/07/2017 12:17

I work in the mass produced food industry.

Use by dates are to tell you when food is safe in its current state. Samples will have been laboratory tested to decide how much 'life' to give a product - basically how long until the natural bacteria has grown to an amount that could make someone ill.

Food does not go off at the stroke of midnight on the use by date. Manufacturers have to allow for the people that drive a long way to the supermarket, or pop into the cafe for tea after doing their shopping so they leave some wiggle room. They also allow for the quality decreasing but that is another thread.

Cooking the food kills that bacteria so 'resets' the clock, if you like. Just like cooking something with 10 days left on the packet doesn't mean you still have 10 days to eat the cooked food. It has changed and new rules apply.

Swipe left for the next trending thread