Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

why didnt they just drive her?

140 replies

NormaSmuff · 01/06/2017 07:25

www.shorehamherald.co.uk/news/health/gran-waits-an-hour-for-ambulance-with-broken-wrist-1-7987356

I cant believe this story. Unless they are missing the part where her relatives have perhaps been drinking. Otherwise the scandal is absolutely on them.
Do you really need an ambulance for a broken wrist?

OP posts:
Sparklingbrook · 01/06/2017 07:26

How odd. They could have called a taxi even.

RoganJosh · 01/06/2017 07:28

Maybe with a head injury they worried that she needed to be checked over before moving her. Or if there was any neck pain that they don't mention they may have been worried about a spinal injury.

UmmAandY · 01/06/2017 07:28

Maybe they don't drive/don't have a car or maybe they didn't have any money for a taxi?

Viserion · 01/06/2017 07:28

Presumably with the bruised hip, they were concerned she might have fractured it? Although on the face of it, I do agree that an ambulance for a broken wrist seems a tad unnecessary.

I also don't think an hour is that long to wait for a conscious person with a non life threatening injury.

Ginmakesitallok · 01/06/2017 07:29

An hour seems pretty good for non life threatening condition. Agree that they should have driven her - or got a taxi

Grumpbum · 01/06/2017 07:29

I expect they didn't know at this point she had only broken her wrist, mentioned she also bruised her hip I suspect they were more concerned she had broken that, hence calling an ambulance.

londonrach · 01/06/2017 07:29

Agree or a taxi or maybe a friend. Ambulance was needed in this case and quite rightly been sent to patients with life threatening conditions eg heart attack, car accident.

FathomsDeepAndFallingFurther · 01/06/2017 07:29

It doesn't look from the picture like sure 'just' broke her wrist. She is elderly and had a fall. Her face is very bruised and the article said she had bad bruising on her hip too. It was sensible not to move her in case of more serious injuries and call an ambulance. I would have done.

NavyandWhite · 01/06/2017 07:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

NormaSmuff · 01/06/2017 07:32

they obviously dont read mumsnet where people are flamed for calling ambulances.
probably bad journalism doesnt help either but tbh should they really have gone to the press for this?

OP posts:
NapQueen · 01/06/2017 07:32

She only waited an hour. The ambulance dispatcher priority is to preserve live. Not provide a taxi service. Her life was not hanging in the balance

Notanotheruser111 · 01/06/2017 07:33

perhaps she was in to much pain, sounds like she hurt her hip as well, which could have made a car or taxi ride too difficult without pain relief or she had mobility issues and they were worried about making the injury worse transporting her themselves.

TestTubeTeen · 01/06/2017 07:35

Yes, but look at the state of her! She must have really hit her head to have incurred bruising like that. I would have felt worry over bundling her into the car.

NormaSmuff · 01/06/2017 07:35

i think you are probably right notanotheruser

OP posts:
Okite · 01/06/2017 07:37

We waited almost an hour for an ambulance when my DD fell out of a tree and had hurt her back so she could be stabilised before being moved. I thought that was a pretty good time given she wasn't in any danger. Conscious patients who don't have life-threatening injuries have to go lower down the list, that's just the way it goes.

Sparklingbrook · 01/06/2017 07:38

The daughter in law works for the fire service so you would think she would understand.

So was she left in a heap in the garden for an hour as they didn't want to move her? It says she was treated in the living room. Confused

Seems like a government bashing piece underneath it all anyway.

timeforabrewnow · 01/06/2017 07:39

meh

NavyandWhite · 01/06/2017 07:40

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OvariesForgotHerPassword · 01/06/2017 07:42

With any traumatic injuries the advice is not to splint any injuries and not to move the patient, which may be why they didn't put her in a car or taxi.

Sparklingbrook · 01/06/2017 07:43

But they moved her to the living room.

feathermucker · 01/06/2017 07:44

It says in the article that the son "even considered driving her himself" as if that were a shocking concept!

TheSleeperandTheSpindle · 01/06/2017 07:46

This will sound hash but she's only 74, I was expectng to see a frail 90 year old. I know she could have other health problems but I don't consider 74 elderly. We have a TA at my school still working full time at 72.

Also it says the son considered driving her himself. Well why didn't he then? Her life wasn't in danger so unfortunately they had to prioritise other cases above her.

Sparklingbrook · 01/06/2017 07:46

You have to love local newspaper articles. Always a joy.

Mummyoflittledragon · 01/06/2017 07:48

If the son considered driving her, perhaps she wasn't in a bad enough way to warrant an ambulance. We don't know the details. Shock and pain can do strange things. Perhaps they carried her into the living room so going the car would have been very difficult.

NormaSmuff · 01/06/2017 07:48

Perhaps the son considered driving her but was worried about moving her as suggested, or he had been drinking was my thought. the journalist is not giving the full story no doubt. the lesson is dont go to the local press, or any press in fact, unless you want to risk being misquoted/half quoted

OP posts: