Just had an argument robust discussion with a gentleman about lane merging.
I was in the right hand lane of a dual carriageway overtaking traffic on the left and see road markings ahead indicating I should move over as the lane is ending. I start to indicate and prepare to merge into an ample gap whereon the driver I have overtaken accelerates and drives bumper to bumper with the car in front of him. As my lane was ending I had to slow down and merge behind him - thankfully the driver behind him maintained the gap!
His argument was:
I was in the "wrong lane"
Merging is illegal
He has right of way so it's OK to block me
My argument:
I'm using the lane exactly as it was intended
Merging is legal
If he had taken no action I'd have merged safely with no incident but his action created danger where there was none, which nobody has a right to do.
He bolstered his argument by claiming he was a driving instructor. I find that very hard to believe but perhaps I've got this all wrong. I'd accept his point if I was trying to bully my way into congested traffic but when you actively take steps to put another driver in a dangerous situation you become a massive twat. 