Yes, there was an interview with Amy siskind where she talked about how he's silencing any opposition:
"...compared to what it is now. I mean, there was one thing unusual that first night, which was there was a New York Times reporter who had tweeted a criticism of his paper, and the next morning I woke up and looked for it, because I thought it was a really interesting tweet, and it was gone. I happened to have screenshotted it, because I had quoted it. I just thought that was an interesting sign of silencing dissent, which was one of the things authoritarian experts had warned about. So, that was the picture for the first week’s list." - See more at: www.damemagazine.com/2017/04/27/trump-and-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-first-100-days#sthash.LkrBWo7i.dpuf"
"I’m very fastidious about backing up the stuff on Medium. I’m not normally a person that is an alarmist, but, yeah, with one good spammer they could come in — and obviously they’re very good at that - and wipe the list away. So I’m very cautious about having them in a bunch of different forms in a lot of different places. Because realistically, yes, this is what happens in silencing dissent. And the first few weeks were very heavy on silencing dissent, if you look at the early lists. Stuff you won’t remember like the union worker that he tweeted about that was getting death threats. From Carrier. He’d said [Trump] didn’t create as many jobs as he publicly said. That kind of stuff. The first few weeks were attacking our media, attacking individuals, attacking anybody that was speaking out. So, that was certainly part of what I thought we could expect, and that was certainly what happened."