Hyde Housing Independent Resident Group
11 March ·
Hi. Thanks for the add.
I have some very important information to share regarding the change that many people in Hyde and other Housing Associations are facing, regarding our rent being due in advance and Housing Benefit (in future Universal Credit) being paid in arrears.
I recently received a letter demanding payment, even though I am in receipt of full Housing Benefit.
This is due to Governmental Political changes.
When I received the letter, I phoned for clarification, and the (typically) rude person I spoke to told me that my Tenancy Agreement states that my rent is due in advance, and that I must ensure that this happens.
Following this, I put out a statement on Facebook, asking if anyone knew what the hell this is all about.
I received a response from a friend who is a Paralegal, and her comment was backed up by another friend who is a shit hot lawyer, and teacher of law students.
THEY HAVE NO LEGAL GROUNDS TO DO THIS.
I will ask my lawyer friend for further clarification, and the precise wording to use (she has already offered this).
But the way the law, all law, works is on the basic of precedence.
Despite the fact that our Tenancy Agreements state rent in advance, Hyde (& other HAs) have willingly entered into a three-way agreement between themselves, us (the Tenants) and Housing Benefit, in which the set legal precedence is that PAYMENTS THROUGH HOUSING BENEFIT ARE PAID IN ARREARS.
Now, the case may be different for newly established tenants from this point forward, but if you signed your tenancy agreement with the understanding that all or part of your rent is paid via Housing Benefit, then they have no legal right whatsoever to demand monies from you in advance.
As and when Universal Credit is rolled out, the same conditions are applied. ALL benefits are paid in arrears, and the expectation and legal precedence stands with those facts.
Do not let them fool you, they are committing an illegal act.
When I get the correct info from my friend, I will post it here.
This is nothing more than yet another attempt to screw over the poor. They are relying on CAB closures and the removal of Legal Aid, as well as our own lack of knowledge on these subjects.
But I repeat that they have no legal grounds, and I believe that if we act as a united front, we can easily build a case of mass discrimination, or individual cases of such.
Sorry if I've rambled, and thanks for your time