Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be excited about the possibility of a successful head transplant!

64 replies

BorrowedHeart · 28/03/2017 17:09

I am genuinely excited about this, even if it doesn't work there is still so much to learn. What are people thoughts on it? How does it sit with you?

I'm excited but that's because my daughter has had a heart transplant and even before hen transplants have fascinated me, if this works it could mean so much to people who aren't able to move and might want to, even just to know if it can work is enough for me.

OP posts:
LadyDeadpool · 28/03/2017 17:14

I'm really weirded out by it tbh! I mean it's amazing that it's even an actual possibility but still how strange!

CaptainBraandPants · 28/03/2017 17:28

It's not a head transplant, though, is it? It should be being called a body transplant.
I think it's interesting, both medically and ethically.

ErrolTheDragon · 28/03/2017 17:35

It should be being called a body transplant

It is (there was a piece in New scientist a while back). Although our bodies do affect our minds in all sorts of ways, so I suppose the result would be, what, more of a macroscopic-level chimera?

reallyanotherone · 28/03/2017 17:40

Have you seen the video of the monkey who had a head transplant?

It's fucking heartbreaking and i wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.

Unless they can figure out how to fix spinal cord injury first, it's never going to happen. Head/body transplant would involve severing the spinal cord at some point so best case would be you're alive, but completely paralysed.

It horrifies me that it's even being considered.

scaredofthecity · 28/03/2017 17:43

I think it is wrong on so many levels, and I have been involved in multiple organ transplants.

If you do some research tissue transplants (such as hands ect) are not very successful and have horrific side effects such as cancer and other life limiting conditions due to the anti-rejection drugs.

I can't remember the exact specifics but I'm sure the life expectancy of the transplant is only about 5 years.

Obviously a new body will dramatically change somebody who is quadriplegic's life but at what cost? There is far more exciting stuff happening in electrical stimulating of the brain.

I would be very surprised (and shocked) if this were to actually happen.

Satishouse · 28/03/2017 17:43

The surgeon has been widely condemned for even considering doing this. It won't end well

reallyanotherone · 28/03/2017 17:49

Ah, read the news articles now.

Surely the first logical step would be to try this amazing "nerve glue" he has developed on para/tetraplegics.

If they up and walk within the month like he claims, there may be something worth investigating.

The fact he can't do this makes me think he's utterly mad.

WaegukSaram · 28/03/2017 17:52

It's fascinating in a car crash way. I also don't think there's much guarantee of success though.

AssassinatedBeauty · 28/03/2017 17:54

Ethically, if this nerve glue works, he should definitely be using it to help those with spinal cord damage first. What is the point of a body transplant if you are still paralysed from the neck down?!

HelenaWay · 28/03/2017 18:01

I think it's awful.

Has the surgeon actually been granted permission now then?

CaseyAtTheBat · 28/03/2017 18:02

What is even the point?

reallyanotherone · 28/03/2017 18:06

What is the point of a body transplant if you are still paralysed from the neck down

Paralysed, and unable to breathe on your own, and likely in shit loads of pain. Plus on immunosuppressants, so you'd likely be dead fairly soon from infection or one of the othe complications of being paralysed.

Yeah. Really excited about it.

anotherpoisonprince · 28/03/2017 18:11

I think it's heartbreaking. Myuch mourned soul mate had CF and I am usually the first to champion and transplant progress.
But this news I find incredibly upsetting. For the same reasons as reallyanotherone has mentioned.

DevelopingDetritus · 28/03/2017 18:17

I think they should concentrate on spinal cord injuries first. This seems sensationalism to me.

user838383 · 28/03/2017 18:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BorrowedHeart · 29/03/2017 01:51

sacred my daughter is at risk from cancer from her anti rejection drugs that she lives on due to a heart transplant, what's the difference?

OP posts:
BorrowedHeart · 29/03/2017 01:57

Spinal cord injury in the event of a crash etc is completely different to slicing one surgically.
Think of it like a rope, (the nerves) if you slice it it's easier to put back together, if it is torn it's not as easy. Making a clean cut while knowing where each part that needs to be reconnected is, would be a lot easier to put back together than one that was damaged.

Take my daughters heart condition, the actual disease she had couldn't be cured, but a new heart would do the job. A body that doesn't work and can't be fixed would be easier to replace entirely with a working body.
I find it all fascinating, no one thought the first heart transplant would go well or that it was ethical, but thanks to those who tried it my daughter is still alive.

OP posts:
BorrowedHeart · 29/03/2017 01:59

casey the 'point' would be to help a man use a body and have some independence, rather than slowly dying and losing all movement entirely. He said himself, he is going to die anyway so would rather try something that could help others, and if he dies it doesn't matter as that was what he was heading towards already. I think he is a brave man to volunteer, and I really hope it goes well, or we learn something from trying.

OP posts:
mommy2ash · 29/03/2017 07:03

If if did work it would require a donor with a healthy body surely. I can't see it being easy sourcing healthy dead bodies. They would need to be relatively young and have no organ or spinal cord damage.

I'm all for organ donation but I think this is a step too far.

shockshockhorror · 29/03/2017 07:40

Can someone tell me what happened with the monkey? I don't want to google because I don't want to see the video but I would like to know the science... thank you.

QueenArseClangers · 29/03/2017 08:47

^ this article from Buzzfeed is from 2015.

PlayOnWurtz · 29/03/2017 09:20

I agree it won't end well until we develop the ability to repair spinal cord injuries. If the surgeon thinks that's possible then why isn't the science already in use? That's got far more widespread use than random body or head transplants

CaseyAtTheBat · 29/03/2017 09:28

Spinal cord injury in the event of a crash etc is completely different to slicing one surgically. Think of it like a rope, (the nerves) if you slice it it's easier to put back together, if it is torn it's not as easy. Making a clean cut while knowing where each part that needs to be reconnected is, would be a lot easier to put back together than one that was damaged.

You're vastly underestimating the complexity of the spinal cord. And its not just that anyway, its not like there is one little cord you can just stick together. There are MILLIONS of connections. Even if you could connect them all, you could never do it in the time you had (which would likely be maximum an hour before the brain died). And it STILL wouldn't work anyway.

This is fantasy stuff. And who is going to donate their body to have someone elses body stuck on to it anyway? No thanks, not interested.

reallyanotherone · 29/03/2017 09:29

The monkey- basically it lived for 18 days, needed assistance to breathe, and was in a metal frame -with effectively a broken neck and horrific surgical wounds completely unable to move. It just kept opening its eyes and swallowing in the most heartbreaking way.

Borrowed heart- organ donation gives the recipient a good quality of life. They're able to go about normal lives, even with the drugs and associated risks.

Head transplant leaves them completely paralysed. No way of living a life outside a hospital bed.

Have you also thought that these "whole body" transplants will be from a brain dead donor. So the healthy heart, lungs, kidneys etc that would have helped half a dozen people will go to one person only. Making single organs even less available.