In the last few months I've had cause to complain to 2 major uk companies. Without going into the minutiae of each complaint, common themes were I was promised callbacks/ emails that didn't happen, given incorrect contact details, advisors spoke over me during calls, tried to pick holes in what I was saying, and asked for irrelevant information claiming it was essential, oh and inferred I was 'confused' about a previous discussion. Then when I tried to submit a complaint either refused to provide an email address or said they wouldn't take complaints by email for security reasons
.
So far, so shit. But you'd think when it got to the complaints team things would improve - ha! Rather than investigate a complaint and give a decision (which is how the company I work for, also a large well known brand, operates) they all want to speak to you over the phone, want you to talk them through the complaint! Jesus Christ, just read the bloody email it's not difficult. And then they talk over you again, or go over the same stuff in the same way you've already complained about...
So then I'm almost having to complain about the way the complaint was dealt with, on and on in an endless cycle! I do get why you might need to check something or have a couple of questions that maybe neither the notes or the complaint didn't address, but there is no justification Imo from effectively forcing a rehash of the complaint and a discussion of the merits of the same especially when the complaint was only made a few hours earlier and you clearly haven't read all the file.
I don't think I'm expecting too much surely?