I am sure there is plenty that we are not being told, but the fact that the GMC did act, even if only with the paid suspension and the warning, does suggest that there is truth in this, whether or not the media have reported the entire story.
The mum did call the GP surgery and was given an urgent appointment, but it left her little time to organise care of her other child and then actually get to the surgery so she informed the receptionist that they were up against it a bit but would be there? That is how I read it, rightly or not.
If that is correct then the GP should have seen her, no question about that. These things happen, and it was an emergency. This was clearly one of those cases where other less urgent appointments have to wait while the urgent case is given priority. It looks as thought this particular doctor may have tackled this case the other way round though, and surely that would always be risky when the patient is known to have bad asthma, or any other potentially life-threatening medical condition.
We have no detail though of what happened in the intervening time when they were turned away from the surgery and when the ambulance was called at 10.30pm. There are gaps in the reporting.
Poor family though. Thoughts are with them.