To think Katie Price wants to take women back in time?

[WanderingNotLost]

Telegraph Article

Apparently strong women don't leave their philandering husbands, because that's taking the 'easy' route...

Why does everyone think that because she's got a 'multi million' pound empire she's some kind of shrewd and clever business woman? She sells ghost written shite to men and women who buy her crap because they buy into her ethos and believe that to have her money is to be happy.

Also she's always saying she never has one night stands as if this is a bad thing. So she's revealing that she judges women who have casual sex.

She does seem young emotionally as well as down right asinine at times and I whilst I would be happy if she achieved some kind of emotional stability ( how many boob jobs???) I would like her to take her shitty attitude and shitty tat that she touts elsewhere.

"She blatantly palms Harvey off to a carer or a nann'

Frankly if I had a profoundly disabled nearly adult child, and lots of money, I would probably do the same.

I can't dislike her for some bizarre reason despite the fact that she represents everything I loathe.

Her children with Peter Andre are stunningly beautiful.

She blatently palms off Harvey to a carer or Nanny

Blatantly? How do you work that one out? And tbh, I would think anyone with 5 children and a career would probably be using some sort of childcare, why single out Harvey? And why shouldn't she? Because she's a mother and should therefore sacrifice herself at the alter of mummy martyrdom?
Stupid comment.

Dwight Yorke Is the only person I will say is a shit father.

I wonder if this thread will be deleted like the Angelina and Brad one was, or like the Peter Andre ones always are.

Or is Katie Price fair game?

As far as I know, her mum is Harvey's carer/nanny. Anyway, Why would anyone begrudge a mum of 5 with a SN child having a nanny?

I don't agree that she wants to take women back in time, because I very much doubt she actually means anything she says. It's all attention-grabbing bullshit designed to garner media coverage. And it works, sadly.

She blatently palms off Harvey to a carer or Nanny.

Actually she's spoken about this before and his disabilities are so profound he needs carers because he needs 24 hour a day care from more than one person. It's necessary care rather than 'palming off'. He also needs a hell of a lot of medical equipment which involves moving it around wherever he goes which is also not a one person job.

IIRC this was Peter Andre's excuse for stopping seeing Harvey; he wouldn't have anybody employed by KP in his house but Harvey could not be without his carers so he stopped seeing him.