Found out last night from the DCs that XDH had taken them out of school at lunch on Friday. I knew that he was taking them to see family in London and that there was some sort of party over the weekend (told in the context of saying DS would miss his football match) but taking them out of school was not mentioned. I don't think half a day is the end of the world - that's not the point. The point is shouldn't he have spoken to me? It transpires that the "family party" he had spoken about was on Friday night and did not actually include the children - they stayed at his parents' house with a babysitter. So in actual fact they were not taken out of school to enjoy a family party but to suit his own social arrangements. The party was his uncle's (by marriage) 80th birthday dinner, and they have always disliked each other (not sure that's really relevant but adding it in as background).
AIBU to think that he should have asked me if I agreed to him taking the DCs out of school - and would IBU if I had said no because it was more about suiting his social arrangements than about them? Or should I just get over myself? Part of me thinks I'm overreacting, but I'm concerned it's a slippery slope and he'll start doing it every time he wants to go up to London for a weekend, to avoid the London rush hour (he takes them up there regularly).
I've raised it with him this morning and his response is "I discussed [going to London] with the DCs and they wanted to go". That's just sidestepping isn't it? The children may well have wanted to go to London, but the older DCs are rather put out they didn't get to go to the party when their cousins the same age DID (although they are uncle's grandchildren and mine are just the great nephews/nieces).