I'm hoping that it's a good sign that she was allowed to call her husband after her court appearance, and that she will now be allowed weekly visitation with Gabriella, but I am not confident given the judge that she has been assigned.
It's a very confusing case. Her husband seemed to adamantly believe that Iran would use her release as a bargaining chip with the UK Government, and not actually try her. The announcement of her trial has shocked him. He has applied for a visa to travel to her, but I don't rate his chances.
Reuters have been quite quiet too, although the CEO has recently spoken out to say that they believe she'll be allowed 45 minutes with a lawyer soon.
The only info on charges appears to be this, from June: "“In 2014-2015, the intelligence service of the Revolutionary Guards in Kerman province identified and arrested members of one of the groups that during the Sedition conducted activities against the security of the country by designing websites and carrying out campaigns in the media,” Movahed said. “Some of the group were outside Iran, including the suspect Nazanin Zaghari.”"
Which makes you wonder if the UK government are not intervening because they would not welcome Iran intervening when we are holding Iranian citizens for terrorism offences.
It's a scary thought that Politics has become so much of a game of pawns that we are all individually expendable to keep the peace.