"As has been said (a million times
) on this thread, there is a huge difference between people who prioritise food, enjoy cooking, drink wine, like 'premium range, organic stuff' etc etc and those who just 'see food as fuel' and don't see what all the fuss is about shopping, cooking and eating"
I honestly think that this is a false dichotomy, because it ignores the 'budget' dimension.
It is possible to be a person who spends an awful lot on food, but just sees food as fuel, and doesn't understand the fuss about shopping and eating. Their food bill may be high because of lots of convenience food / ready meals / eating out / takeaways; buying brands through lack of knowledge; lack of time / interest in searching out cheaper alternatives or cooking from scratch.
Equally, it is possible to be a person who spends a lot on food because they buy 'the best of everything' and eat a lot of expensive cuts of meat and fish, buy lots of out of season fruit etc etc.
Or you can be a person who spends very little on food but just sees food as fuel, and doesn't understand the fuss about shopping and eating. In that case the spend may be on cheap basics (ready prepared or tinned / packaged), a fairly limited range of foods etc.
Or you can be a person who prioritises food, enjoy cooking, drink wine, likes 'premium range, organic stuff' but still has a low budget, so buys those things in more limited quantities and in cheaper forms - cheaper cuts of good meat, added to casseroles or stews or sauces with lots of other cheaper items to 'stretch' them, more use of non-meat or cheaper alternatives such as pulses or vegetables or eggs, purchases items from discount stores or in bulk (rice in sacks and spices from Asian supermarkets, sacks of potatoes, that kind of thing) etc.
It really isn't a simple 'spends lots because they buy good food / spends a little because they don't care' dichotomy.