I know the thread has somewhat moved on, but sharknad0 asked for something to be explained, so I thought I'd help.
Women shave their legs, (most) men don't. So what? I wear nail varnish on my toes, my husband doesn't. So what? Does it make any of us weaker than the other? Shaving is a sign of oppression? Talk about a storm in a tea cup.
Yes, shaving is a SIGN of oppression; it's not the sum total of oppression. No one is saying "I hate men because there's this one singular thing that they expect of me and it's that I have smooth silky legs". It's a symptom of a much wider issue, and frankly, people who think we shouldn't question this stuff are part of the problem. If we never questioned anything; if we just sat on our pretty little bottoms and smiled and nodded, we'd still be without jobs, or the right to vote, or the right to abortions, or any of the other victories that feminism has given us over the years.
Furthermore, most feminists (the good ones) don't look down on people for choosing to shave - we are fighting for your right to a choice in what you do with your own body, not to impose a matriarchal set of rules. That would make us just as bad as the patriarchy.
Bodily autonomy, and the right to feel comfortable in your own skin, is incredibly important and is something that women are constantly and insidiously denied.