sandrabedminster
Yes, I thought that was fair enough for a hike. Though if possible the protein content could do with being higher.
Tail - is that now in the past with ww? Are calories counted differently?
I was very aware of what young girls were saying a few years back..
"oo don't have ab avocado..an egg ...they are full of fat" Meanwhile they ate cupcakes and chocolate bars!
I saw a weight watchers success story on the thelevision say 'a calorie is a calorie... and apple is to much if it takes you over the calorie limit'.
I would say the apple was fine but the slice of bad white bread she had instead was not.
Then a friend did weight watchers and I was quite involved and saw, for example, that a plain full yogurt might have more points in than another one full of sugar.
Meanwhile, I was personally aware of new ideas showing how sugar affects the metabolism differently by causing surges of insulin which make the body store everything as fat.
Nuts have fat and potentially fattening if you eat loads, but they will not cause an insulin surge. Whereas the sugar does and it also then crashes about twenty minutes later and a person can feel hungry again and want to eat more - possibly even feel ravenous.
With nuts, because they are full of protein the body feels as though it has eaten and is more likely to feel satiety and with no sugar there is no crash.
With a diet with adequate protein the body is less likely to lose muscle and gain fat.
I think I heard that weight watchers has no given more points to sugar than they used to.