I'll try to keep it succinct...
I live in a very poor country. Huge unemployment, lots of people living on the streets etc. We are comparatively very rich.
We don't like to do lots of presents at Christmas because it seems so inappropriate when there are so many who won't even eat on Christmas day, and we've managed to convince my(extremely numerous) inlaws to do a secret Santa style Christmas, where we will all buy and receive one gift. Perfect!
With the money we save, we have bought food and gifts for a few families that we know who will not get presents.
My parents in law suggested to the whole family that we put together a big hamper to "treat" a family that they know. This was fine by us, it's a bag of extra groceries that we can happily afford. As I'm into making things pretty, it was decided that everyone would deliver their contributions to me, and I'd make up the hamper.
So, yesterday we received bags from everyone - lovely treats of food, toiletries, scarves etc from all aunts, uncles, cousins, siblings etc... Then I get to sorting out the bag from my parents in law... The ones who suggested it... The ones who know the people it's going to...
I kid you not, they've had a spring clean. Not even a "we've got extra of this" spring clean, but a "we don't want this crap" spring clean. It included: Out of date flour, out of date beans, a sticky gross bag of out of date rice (with spiders webs on it??!!), a tin of mussels that expired in 2012, and a half used tub of aqueous cream...
I've removed them, and went to buy a few extra things to replace them, but does that not seem incredibly stingy to you?! Why even suggest it if you don't want to do it properly?! Is it just to look generous?
I'm sorely tempted to say something, but I know I'm too polite to really :( damn my sense of proprietary! Would it be hugely unreasonable to give them back their things, gift wrapped, as Christmas gifts..?! 