Ignore the headline here but look at the data:
Month on month prices fell by 0.1%.
New prospective buyers declined by 34% but viewings only fell by 4%. Sales volumes in September rose from August and were on track to match September 2014.
So prices are very slightly down, speculative demand has fallen considerably, but sales in September were like on like for the previous year. Its hardly stagnant, just not growing at an exponential rate as before. Which if you consider how many are able to buy that kind of property is probably about right seeing as the number of sales of this type rose between 2009 and 2015.
I don't rate the argument about not handing the state such a huge windfall. Surely the properties of this type wouldn't be worth anything as much without state input.
Fairly pleased someone who is set to buy a £1 million plus "second home" for investment purposes has been put off.
Also this statement " it tends to be dual couples working all the hours god sends". Lets do the sums on this figure.. So lets start with a deposit.. How much do you need to have a house worth £1 mil, so lets start with the very basic 10%, that leaves £900,000 mortgage to pay. Ok so to get one of these you would need to have £200,000 dual income a year. Which gives you approximately £16, 666 a month gross salaries. The increase on SD for this type of house is only £3,750. I'm sure someone on that kind of income can cover it.
Otherwise the people buying properties like this, and yes I know the increase on something that is worth £1.5 million is £18,000, are ones who have seen the value of their own property rise significantly and are able to pay hefty deposits themselves. Again, the increase isn't really an issue for them.
The people buying this type of property are not put off by taxes, please don't trot out the "working couple" line because it really doesn't make sense.