Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think that this sentence is an utter nonsense

11 replies

Busyworkingmum71 · 07/11/2015 23:46

And that social services should be involved. If this goes on in a public place wtf is going on at home? Those poor kids.

metro.co.uk/2015/11/06/wife-gave-husband-a-blow-job-in-front-of-westfield-shopping-centre-lifts-as-their-kids-looked-on-5484769/

OP posts:
CoteDAzur · 07/11/2015 23:50

YANBU. A more meaningful sentence would be "... this sentence is an utter nonsense".

hiddenhome2 · 07/11/2015 23:50
Confused
Busyworkingmum71 · 08/11/2015 00:02

CotedAzure, your superiority really shines through. Biscuit

OP posts:
Scarletforya · 08/11/2015 00:13

I read that earlier. Having sex in front of their children imo is abuse. The children should be removed from them. Never mind the whole public place aspect.

AgentZigzag · 08/11/2015 00:34

Yeah, definitely agree that if they 'accidentally' do this when they're out shopping then they're not going to care about their DC seeing stuff at home are they?

And a very bizarre sentence, to me anyway. I thought letting your (very young) DC have contact with anything inappropriate sex wise was one of the flags SS look out for.

PaulAnkaTheDog · 08/11/2015 00:36

I read this and was gobsmacked. I would hope there is more going on with SS.

QueenArseClangers · 08/11/2015 00:40

Jeez! social services should def be involved.
How fucking bizarre, it's like the authorities are more offended about the public place issue.

MyNewBearTotoro · 08/11/2015 01:04

To be fair there are probably restrictions regarding what the newspaper is allowed to report and there is probably more to this than has been covered here. The court reporter would only be able to include information given by the judge during sentencing in this story.

SS may well be involved (I would say it seems likely) but that couldn't really be reported by the papers unless involvement by SS was actually part of the judge's sentencing. The parents still have a right to privacy despite committing this crime so there will be information the papers couldn't include.

PegsPigs · 08/11/2015 01:46

The most bizarre thing I've read in a long time. In public and in front of your kids. Some serious boundary issues of what is and isn't acceptable behaviour.

Unreasonablebetty · 08/11/2015 02:01

When I read the article my jaw dropped to the floor, I then read the papers at MILS house and said, where are Social services? If this goes on in public with their children around I don't want to hazard a guess at what the kids see at home...

ConsciousPilot · 08/11/2015 02:24

I can't honestly believe this. I feel so, so sorry for those children.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page