Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School trips which are only affordable to a minority of parents - just why?

266 replies

Mintyy · 01/10/2015 21:10

Why do schools do this?

If someone can explain, I am all ears!

I am talking about non-leafy state comprehensive schools here.

OP posts:
Sallyhasleftthebuilding · 04/10/2015 11:34

Bubble you missed the point. The point being that schools dont have to organise two weeks to Africa for 20 kids they could organise a trip for all the kids to Wales .. thereby narrowing the gap, making it affordable. They could do both.

Bubbletree4 · 04/10/2015 11:38

I haven't missed the point, I've tried to explain why the gap cannot be narrowed. School takes kids to Wales, parents will take kids to Africa as well. Gap not narrowed.

Sallyhasleftthebuilding · 04/10/2015 11:42

The difference is that school.is for all, and they should cater for all, and not just those that have deep pockets.

GnomeDePlume · 04/10/2015 13:22

Exactly Sally and every second of time and ounce of goodwill spent on these trips takes away from the majority

nokidshere · 04/10/2015 13:23

It still wouldnt make any difference. I know parents can afford the trips but don't go, and ones who can't afford the trips but wouldn't go anyway even if subsidised.

We have had trips cancelled due to not enough take up so then none of the children get to go. Even curriculum ones where you only pay if you can.

There is never going to be an even playing field. Not in school, work or personal lives

SquirrelledAway · 04/10/2015 14:18

I'd still like to go back to a previous point - what happened to proper school field trips? Looking at glacial features in the Lake District, running around Norman ruins or measuring long shore drift on a Devon beach? Trips at DS's school have been kayaking down the Ardeche or similar - fun activities but I'd much rather they got something useful for school courses out of it. Fine to have something like a skiing trip just for fun, but I think schools are missing a trick.

Mehitabel6 · 04/10/2015 14:25

My DCs went on trips that were for school subjects. (Apart from the one ski trip)

SquirrelledAway · 04/10/2015 14:36

Our school doesn't do any residential field trips - we have Activities week, which is really just expensive holidays for the S1-S3s.

elizadolittlechoc · 04/10/2015 14:40

Guilty for letting my kids go on Europe ski trips with their Academy as it was something we could never afford as a family. However we drew the line and certainly couldn't afford trips to LA and Hollywood, New York, Iceland, Peru which the school boasts about and uses as a sales ploy to encourage middle class 'achiever' families to join the schol from out of catchment at open days. However we note it is always the same kids and same teachers (strange how the teachers so keen for free trip and have to be in staff room clique to get on!!) our school does not subsidise FSM kids on such trips. It is not realistic to say that children could raise the thousands required, unless they have very supportive parents with time to spare. There is only one 'inclusive' 3 day camping trip in Year 7. The children who would benefit most tend to have the least supportive or able home lives. In comparison, the local grammar and private schools do trips to Wales, Isle of Wight at reasonable cost. IMO yet another Academy fail.

merrymouse · 04/10/2015 15:15

Of course there is not equality of opportunity in life, but there should be equality of opportunity at school.

When schools advertise expensive trips they normalise the idea that this is the kind of thing your parents should pay for, not the kind of thing you wait maybe 5 years to pay for yourself.

elizadolittlechoc · 04/10/2015 16:38

Agree, merry mouse. But that doesn't seem to be an OFSTED requirement for 'outstanding' and thus the career progression of involved staff, who are praised for their extra curricular commitment and creative curriculum choices??

elizadolittlechoc · 04/10/2015 16:39

Oops tablet fail on ??

Washediris · 04/10/2015 16:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Suzi78 · 04/10/2015 17:39

If parents don't want their children to go on expensive trips or they can't afford it thennt send them, easy. At my ds's secondary school all pupils who get free school meals get to go completely free on all days out and trips away and it makes my boil. This year I paid £724 for my ds to go Barcelona and i'm shelling out another £692 for him to go to Berlin next year. I can afford it so I'm not going to allow my child to miss out but why should other people get it free of charge?.....so i get a little annoyed when I see parents moaning about the cost, if you don't want your child to go then don't allow them to.

Hulababy · 04/10/2015 17:56

Pupil Premium for 2015-16

£1,320 for pupils in reception year to year 6
£935 for pupils in year 7 to year 11

Thats not going to cover the cost of some of the trips mentioned on here.

"Schools are free to spend the Pupil Premium as they see
fit. However, they are accountable for how they use the
additional funding to support pupils from low-income
families and the other target groups. "

So, if a school does use it to pay for trips they must report that and demonstrate how it helps to close the gap, and what impact it has on progress for pP children as a whole.

Washediris · 04/10/2015 18:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page