This is not a political thread, but a thread about descriptions used by journalists and whether or not they are right and fair to use the words they do.
I saw the news Jeremy Corbyn has been elected Labour's new leader and clicked on the BBC article to read about it. The first sentence began "The veteran left winger...".
I then clicked on the article about Tom Watson, which within he first paragraph described him as a "political heavyweight bruiser".
It seems to me that the BBC are subtly calling Corbyn 'old' and Watson 'overweight'. Am I reading too much into it? Is it fair to use such leading words/phrases about someone's personal characteristics when the articles should be about their politics? Is it because they can get away with digs about age and weight, whereas a comment about someone's skin colour would never be allowed (unless they made a dig at the Labour London Mayor as I don't think I read that article)?
What do you think?