Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to wonder if this is true?

35 replies

Classroomblues · 04/08/2015 19:12

My friend was telling me (so not sure if it's true or she's heard from someone else) that if you use certain buzz words in an email, you could have the police knocking at your door and/or searching your house. Shock
I knew that emails weren't private but didn't realise such a system of alerting the authorities was in place.

From what she said, I think it's mainly linked to threads of possible terrorism but not totally sure.

I am glad this isn't common knowledge as I'm sure there would be some teens who would do this deliberately just for fun! Hmm

OP posts:
DeeWe · 05/08/2015 23:42

My old phone used to autocorrect dd2's name to "bomb".

If this was true I imagine they have spent years wondering how to decode "dd2 is refusing to do homework again".Grin

PelvicFloorClenchReminder · 05/08/2015 23:47

Is it saying 'Police' three times in a row, as in Candyman and Beetlejuice?

ZingDramaQueenOfSheeba · 05/08/2015 23:47

Dee

Grin

check out damnyouautocorrect.com
truly hilarious stuff

ZingDramaQueenOfSheeba · 05/08/2015 23:48

pelvic

candyman is 5 times.

PelvicFloorClenchReminder · 05/08/2015 23:50

Ahh, thank you Zing

Maybe you have to say 'police' 999 times?

ZingDramaQueenOfSheeba · 05/08/2015 23:57

ha!
luckily not.

according to a film series I've been watching almost 40 percent of emergency calls are the result of pocket dials. if it's true that is shockingly bad

ZingDramaQueenOfSheeba · 05/08/2015 23:58

although if they only appeared if you said "police" 999 times I wonder what the magic number is for deliveries!Grin Grin

ZingDramaQueenOfSheeba · 06/08/2015 00:00

(and I love your name.
Thanks for the reminderWink)

cozietoesie · 06/08/2015 00:32

Closer - from the relevant Guardian article for your interest.

'According to GCHQ's legal advice, it was given the go-ahead by applying old law to new technology. The 2000 Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) requires the tapping of defined targets to be authorised by a warrant signed by the home secretary or foreign secretary.

However, an obscure clause allows the foreign secretary to sign a certificate for the interception of broad categories of material, as long as one end of the monitored communications is abroad. But the nature of modern fibre-optic communications means that a proportion of internal UK traffic is relayed abroad and then returns through the cables.'

textfan · 06/08/2015 02:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page