Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Obviously it is a great idea for Working Parents but

54 replies

Iliveinalighthousewiththeghost · 18/07/2015 19:39

Am I being unreasonable to wonder how the government are going to subsidise this.

OP posts:
Momzilla82 · 20/07/2015 15:02

This isn't supposed to be goady- honestly. Can anyone please explain to me why anyone thought it was a good idea for government to support single parents to stay out of work until 12/ 7/ 5/ 3? I just don't get it. As a parent who happens to be married I am not afforded that same support. I could never afford to take the full year maternity leave, let alone any unpaid breaks

Momzilla82 · 20/07/2015 15:06

And to be clear this isn't about their entitlement to the money. It is about whether it's in the best interests of the child to have a parent getting more and more detached from the labour market and deskilling over a number of years. Not to mention isolated from having adult company. It sounds like entirely the wrong approach to me. as a total simpleton

Superexcited · 20/07/2015 15:21

momzilla not everyone wants to go out to work when their children are very young. Some people see raising their children without the use of childcare as very important. Some people mistrust childcare for various reasons. Not everyone wants or needs the company of colleagues.
I'm not saying it's right to rely on govt support to enable those choices but many single parents will rely on hefty govt support to enable them to work anyway.

BackforGood · 20/07/2015 18:50

kirby "It will work. Everyone had this panic about the 2 year old places and that worked out fine."

The point is though, it hasn't worked out fine.

"None have gone without a place in my area."

Our authority can't buy anywhere near enough places for the demand, let alone all the people who are entitled but then don't demand their place. They are hundreds of places short.
Our Nurseries have been subsidising each and every place. That's just for 'the place'. The funding then doesn't allow for any additional funding for children with SEN/D, or with huge social and emotional issues, or for the settings who have to attend regular CP meetings, fill in referrals, support families.
Nurseries just can't afford it, and I know already of some Nurseries who have been taking the funding but are withdrawing from the scheme now as they can't afford to do it.

Spartan "Our school only does morning sessions currently. So they will be able to increase theirs to accommodate".

Where I live and work, all school Nurseries are already full, all day ~ how do you think they are going to magic up the extra hours? It's either ignore the 30 hours requirement, or only be able to reach half the children.

Countryandchickens "I think this is a really good policy. I've been surprised at the resistance to it on here, in fact." - I don't think huge numbers of people on here think it would a bad thing if the government were putting their money where their mouth is. Fact - the EEE and 2 yr funding is not working due to lack of funding, so I think people are trying to understand how they are expecting twice as many hours to suddenly become available.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page