This is not in any way a defence of affairs or the OWs part that they play in affairs, but recently a family friend has been revealed as having an affair with another friends husband (she was single) - this is absolutely horrendous behaviour and I don't condone it at all. However I am getting pretty fed up of the argument everyone keeps putting forwards that she is a very attractive woman, who dresses up and is known as having had quite a few sexual partners - that somehow this absolves the man of the some of the responsibility as how is he expected to help himself when this is offered? And then follows the saying of 'ohh don't let her near your husband' as if her very presence would make him lose all sense and have sex with her and 'he just can't help it'. I would still expect my husband to be faithful even if 1000 naked women paraded in front of him offering him anything he wanted!! I've just been really shocked by how many people seem to think she is more to blame than the man by tempting him and being so attractive etc - I don't get why this is relevant or how it absolves him in any way!! As far as I am concerned they are equally to blame, but in terms of his wife - HE cheated - HE broke his trust and promises - HE betrayed her. The OW behaved terribly and I hope feels incredibly guilt for her part, but how she looks, behaves, etc cannot absolves him of any responsibility about what he freely chooses to do!