Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

counting weeks and then months

13 replies

Starbrite00 · 06/07/2015 14:07

Does anyone find this really annoying?
I have two daughters.
When they were first born you obviously when asked give their age in days or weeks, then when weeks turn in to 30 + you generally give the months they are.
What I really find laughable is when people are asked their childs age say oh she/he is 27 months!!!. No dear your child is 2.
I think once the child has gone through milestones to say 2 years what is the actual point in giving your Childs age in months?

Feel like replying, oh my oldest is 108 months old, dont they grow fast Hmm

OP posts:
AuntyMag10 · 06/07/2015 14:09

Yanbu it sounds so stupid when people do this.

Zzzsnatcher · 06/07/2015 14:10

Yea I do!
I say just turned 3, or 3 and a half, or nearly4. Depending on where they are in relation to their fourth birthday, for example.

DearHound · 06/07/2015 14:13

Yanbu, but I never did this when they were little either.... They were always just under 1, or nearly 2.

DisappointedOne · 06/07/2015 14:15

There's a massive difference between a child that's just turned 2 and one that's turning 3 next week. So I don't think just saying "they're 2" is enough, really.

Teabagbeforemilk · 06/07/2015 14:17

I have a friend whose child is currently 36 months old. Yes it' odd.

I always round kids age up or down. Ds is 4 (really 4 and a half) and ds has been 11 for at least 5 months (she is actually 11 next week) most people don't need/want to know exactly

cardibach · 06/07/2015 14:19

Depends on the context, Disappointed . In a medical covers atop you might want to be more precise, but in casual conversation 2 or almost 3 would be sufficient. I think that's what the OP is talking about.

cardibach · 06/07/2015 14:20

Covers atop? Conversation!

Hissy · 06/07/2015 14:21

couldn't agree more OP!

No excuse for it. idiotic, and needless.

IMO it's weeks until it gets to 3m and then it's months until 1 year.

18 months is the next marker then 2 years. (use of the words almost/nearly etc are applicable here)

then it goes in half years as and when appropriate.

AuntyMag10 · 06/07/2015 14:21

Agree with cardi. Unless it's important to know the exact age, most people don't really care.

SlinkyB · 06/07/2015 14:21

I find it odd sometimes too, when it's just in casual conversation with a stranger. I try not to smirk when they say things like "she's 28 months".

I tend to say "he was three in January" if I think the person asking might want to know roughly when they turned their current age.

BackforGood · 06/07/2015 14:26

Depends on the context. For me (when I ask about dc for my job) then it is very, very important if they are 25months or 35 months - makes a HUGE difference developmentally. If I were chatting to a stranger in the park though, then it's less important.

Starbrite00 · 06/07/2015 14:33

Backforgood...im talking about general chat.
When you go to a health professional you still don't give months you state their date of birth and the health professional should have the records anyway.

OP posts:
humanstain · 06/07/2015 14:39

My ds is just over 5 months. Have no idea how many weeks that is Confused Blush

New posts on this thread. Refresh page