We are planning a second baby. We live in a largish 3 bed house. DD has the smallest room, we have the second largest and then a double set up in the spare room along with a computer desk for when we work at home. DH started to talk about how we might move the rooms around to accommodate a nursery. All rooms have lovely, modern fitted furniture that the previous owners installed not long before they sold up. It is very good quality and dh does not want to remove any of it because it is nicer than we could afford to buy. The trouble is, we would have to in order to make one of the rooms more child friendly. The fitted furniture in both rooms is designed to surround a double bed. There would be no room for DD's stuff if we didn't take out at least the bedside tables. I'd sooner not bother with a nursery because the double bed in the spare room would prove to be more handy. I could easily move the crib into there if thr baby was up a lot so that dh could sleep (he'd be working) With dd, I went OTT and whilst her nursery was beautiful, it wasn't used for the first 7 months as she was in with us. Then there were things that were totally impractical like linen nappy storage that I never had time to fill up. I'd rather wait until the baby is ready for a room of their own before rearranging the bedrooms. However, DH is upset because he thinks that the nursery is special. Aibu? Should I be less practical about this?