itsveryyou Wed 08-Apr-15 14:52:21
Any vote is better than none, even if your party has no chance of being elected this time, or you don't feel your particular parliamentary rep is doing 'a good job'. How will change happen if we choose to sit by and let 'the other side' win? It's about the bigger picture; if you don't vote, you can't really complain when things remain the same or go awry, in your eyes.
If you really want to make a real difference in addition to casting a vote in a democratic election, then campaign, lobby, get active in your local community, be the voice you want to hear, get people on-board and be the change you want to see. Engage with your local councillors and MPs and make yourself heard all year round, not just once every four years.
This.
Its all very well moaning that the parties are out of touch and don't represent you. Thing is, even if you don't vote for someone they still represent your interests in parliament. They can't do that if they don't know what your interests are; I don't believe you can't expect them to actively go out and seek that opinion on every issue - primarily because its humanly impossible. Its up to members of the public to bring that issue to the attention to the MP and how important it is to them. If they have no one moaning about x, y or z in writing then even if its an issue that the media cover, then they don't really have much of an idea of how strongly the public feel - they only have an idea based on what the gatekeepers of the media think is important (which might be a distortion of the truth). If they take information from an unfiltered source they run the risk of thinking certain issues are more important than they really are to the public.
The whole thing is similar to one complain = 100 voices in retail.
UKIP as a party who don't have many candidates actually in seats are an interesting point here; are they reflecting public feeling OR do they know how to use the media to misrepresent that public feeling and to control the agenda to suit their purposes. They are much more of a lobbying group at present because they lack actual power.
Also just because an MP is for 'the other side' doesn't mean they won't listen. I have a friend who didn't vote for her local MP, but when she had a problem and needed the MP's help, he went out of his way to help, because she brought the problem to him and asked for help. She would never have voted for him because of his party but probably will now because of the effort and hard work that he put into supporting her. Her case is representative of all the 'little jobs' that don't get publicised but are still very important outside of national politics.